Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FarCenter

I would think that as strategic as it may be, when there is little to no immediate adversary to fend of, that in a war time situation it is likely very vulnerable, with no other immediate assets near to it. My guess is if it is so strategic, because we have made it that way, it would be a very early target of a determined adversary. Too bad we and India have had such lousy relations over the decades that we cannot just have a base in southern India.


14 posted on 02/07/2023 5:30:31 AM PST by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Wuli

We tried to but they got scammed out of it by a fake indian call center.


21 posted on 02/07/2023 6:06:26 AM PST by pas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: Wuli

Or why have a base at all? We are basically un-invadable and cannot be subdued in any sense with a nuclear deterrent and an armed populace. It’s the same reason China, India, Russia, etc cannot be invaded and subdued. It’s a zero sum game and we are all playing like it is WWII. If we closed just 1/2 to 3/4 of out overseas bases and minded our own business we could take care of some of this debt, fix our social safety string, and in the long run reduce taxes and the MIC.


22 posted on 02/07/2023 6:07:26 AM PST by WalkerinSC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: Wuli

It isn’t strategic because we made it that way, it is strategic because of geography and the present state of technology.


37 posted on 02/07/2023 6:41:23 AM PST by piasa (Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson