Posted on 12/15/2022 8:12:25 PM PST by SeekAndFind
Lawsuits against illegal actions pertaining to the recent midterm elections in Arizona are bringing forth facts that were heretofore hidden. Republican Kari Lake is pursuing her lawsuit against the counting of the ballots, and Arizona State Senator Sonny Borrelli has filed a lawsuit against Katie Hobbs and Maricopa County on behalf of Mohave County, alleging that Maricopa County “experimented with unproven and proprietary artificial intelligence in voter signature verification.”
Borrelli’s lawsuit states that due to Maricopa County’s use of “unproven software programs that improperly but unavoidably influenced the judgment of poorly trained workers tasked with signature verification, in violation of Arizona statutory law, the voting strength of residents of Mohave County, Arizona, was diluted and their Constitutional rights were violated.”
State Senator Sonny Borrelli filed the lawsuit on Monday against Katie Hobbs and Maricopa County for disenfranchising Arizona voters by their lawless behavior in the 2022 midterm elections, Gateway Pundit reports.
The Gateway Pundit also reported that on December 15th Mohave County Arizona Board of Supervisors will also discuss possible litigation against Maricopa County for stealing the 2022 election from the people of Arizona, as Maricopa County illegally relied on unproven third-party artificial intelligence software to verify ballot signatures at Runbeck.
Senator Wendy Rogers called Maricopa County out for flouting the law and making up its own rules in a recent tweet.
.@SonnyBorrelli Our AZ Senate & House NEVER AUTHORIZED
Artificial Intelligence (AI) signature verification. It’s NOT in Secretary of State's Election Procedures Manual. Maricopa County flouted the law; made up their own rules; defied spirit & intent of law. They went ROGUE.— Wendy Rogers (@WendyRogersAZ) December 13, 2022
Borrelli told The Gateway Pundit, “I’m challenging the fact that Maricopa County is the only county that used artificial intelligence to verify signatures on a ballot envelope.” He continued, “there’s nothing in the law that allows them to do that.”
“The legislature never passed a law to allow this type of technology. It’s not in the Elections Procedures Manual,” Borrelli stated “It’s obvious that Maricopa County went rogue and just did whatever they wanted to do, without any legislative authority whatsoever.”
Senator Borrelli’s lawsuit against Maricopa County states, in part:
Evidently, to try to speed up its signature verification process, Maricopa County election officials took an unproven approach in the recent general election by delegating to a private corporation and its software (“the Delegated Software”) the crucial job of assessing the veracity of signatures on approximately 1.3 million mail-in ballots and presumably ballots retrieved from drop boxes. Maricopa intended that the Delegated Software would compare a voter’s signature on a mail-in ballot or ballot retrieved from a drop box against a signature exemplar the voter had signed in the past, such as a record from the Department of Motor Vehicles. Untrained temporary workers would then be hired to review the software’s adjudications. But County election officials indulged this experiment without first putting in place safeguards to make sure it worked.
The brief expounds on artificial intelligence, and the use of such in Maricopa County, which is not authorized by Arizona law. the brief also details the failures of the county in using the procedures, as well as the flaws in the system that account for the errors, in regard to the laws in place in Arizona which govern such protocols.
Gateway Pundit noted:
“Because Mohave County used a more rigorous system to verify signatures for mail-in ballots, Maricopa County officials, in using The Delegated Software without legally adequate human verification, diluted the voting strength of residents of Mohave County. Defendants introduced artificial intelligence software into the procedures and training of human workers in a manner not authorized by Arizona statute and antithetical to the rights and protections guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution, including the fundamental right of each voter to know his or her vote counted.5
Maricopa County officials’ use of the Delegated Software to make decisions that can only be made by well-trained human beings illegally and unavoidably overcounted the number of verifiable ballots counted in Maricopa County, resulting in the disenfranchisement of Mohave electors who had properly cast their ballots in a county that followed state election law and verified each signature properly, by trained human beings.
This is material because only 17,116 votes separated the winner from the loser in the gubernatorial race. Maricopa County outsourced the processing of 1,311,734 mail-in or drop-off ballots to its unreliable system of (1) unproven software and (2) untrained Signature Verifiers. Upon information and belief, the margin for error in an AI-driven software like the Delegated Software, using only static or offline signature data, is at least three percent (3%).6 Applying a 3% margin of error to 1,311,734 signatures yields 39,352 falsely accepted signatures, which could have affected the outcome of the general election for governor.”
The Gateway Pundit also reported that whistleblowers in Kari Lake’s lawsuit revealed that tens, if not hundreds, of illegitimate or mismatched ballot signatures, were verified, approved, and counted illegally.
Also in Kari Lake’s filing, a Runbeck whistleblower revealed that HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS of ballots had no chain of custody documentation. This is a shocking and massive violation of the law. both lawsuits are proceeding this week.
You can see the four exhibits of evidence below:
Sonny Borrelli 2022 Election Contest Exhibit 1
Sonny Borrelli 2022 Election Contest Exhibit 2
Sonny Borrelli 2022 Election Contest Exhibit 3
Sonny Borrelli 2022 Election Contest Exhibit 4
Capital crimes
How did it take two weeks to count it if the computer checked the signatures.
Only an assumption here, but I would guess that more than 75-percent of the tasking failed on the first, second, third and so on attempts. To reach some level of satisfaction, they kept changing the code.
Corruption in Maricopa County? Say it isn’t so, Jim!
I disagree with the statement that the election workers were poorly trained.
They did exactly what they were trained to do.
Are there any judges in AZ with any stones or are they all sold out leftists?
The clown audit done on the 2020 AZ election, oddly did not include signature checks.
Knowing the criminal cabal running the election, it took time to reprint the ballots again and fill them out first.
Bookmark
That cabal included the McCain wing of the Party.
They use those machines in Oregon and they are questionable how accurate they are. They supposedly kick out anything that does match and then go to human review but a lot of signatures go through that are a lot different than the one in their records.
That’s a good question
It will be dismissed and shoved down the memory hole.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.