Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jeff Chandler

Is this in addition to the Osprey?

The v-280 seats 14 where the Osprey seats 24.

240 troops vs 140 seems a big deal to me, but then the
range of this one looks to be much farther. (per ten
aircraft delivering in a group)

Are these two competing, or do they both have a role to play? The Osprey may be limited to mid range say 250
miles out and 250 back.

As I understand it they can both travel much vaster than
a large helicopter delivering troops way out side the
helicopter’s range with a large payload.

Anyone disagreeing with this please chime in. I’d like
to understand exactly what’s going on here.


39 posted on 12/05/2022 6:25:40 PM PST by DoughtyOne (I pledge allegiance to the flag of the U S of A, and to the {Const'l} REPUBLIC for which it stands.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: DoughtyOne

This is a smaller and simpler descendant of the Osprey. If bought in projected volumes, it will also be considerably cheaper.

The V-280 cannot replace the Osprey and the Osprey would be a bad replacement for a V-280. They’re similar looking aircraft but with different roles.

One thing that needs to be noted - a tilt rotor is considerably more quiet than a conventional helicopter until it gets to the LZ. Something to be considered for operational concerns.


45 posted on 12/05/2022 6:40:23 PM PST by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson