[semimojo]

No, the right not to have the government suppress speech of the citizens in the public square.

When I see that happening I'll agree with you.

[Sarcazmo]

Still here making a fool of yourself I see. Heh heh... some things never change. Well, take care.

[Boogieman]

It's already established by Supreme Court precedent whether you choose to "see" it or not:

"Social media allows users to gain access to information and communicate with one another on any subject that might come to mind. With one broad stroke, North Carolina bars access to what for many are the principal sources for knowing current events, checking ads for employment, speaking and listening in the modern public square..."

Packingham vs. North Carolina (2016) - US Supreme Court