Yes. This will be you in nine years if you don't send ALL of your money into the tax man.
(apologies to those with squeamish sensibilities)
The last paragraph says it all. Anyone/anything that disagrees with the IPCC climate crisis narrative is considered "a huge threat". There is no dissension allowed. Anything other than what the IPCC says is mis-/dis-information that must be banned.
All Tech companies must follow the above edict and squash dissenters.
When you can’t debate your positions expect skepticism.
When the raison d'etre of your "organization" is not presenting your views to the public, but denying opposing views from being presented to the public.
Smart thinking.
They’ve been telling us for forty years that we only have 10 years to act.
My friends are gonna be there too.
Livin’ easy
Lovin’ free
Season ticket on a one-way ride
Askin’ nothin’
Leave me be
Takin’ everything in my stride
Don’t need reason
Don’t need rhyme
Ain’t nothin’ I’d rather do
Goin’ down
Party time
My friends are gonna be there too, yeah
I’m on the highway to hell
On the highway to hell
Highway to hell
I’m on the highway to hell
>> Climate Change Denial
Shove it up your Machiavellian ****
Hey Rabid Climate Change Idiots, we have been experimenting global warming since the last Ice Age about 18,000 years ago. So STFU, morons.
Who is Katie Collins to premptorially declare that the “science about climate change is unequivocal”?
What are her qualifications to do so?
97 percent of the 97 percent (both percentages are made up) of scientists who believed humans were a significant influence on the climate in the ‘80s and ‘90 have recanted their positions based on the failures and frauds of the models to predict anything.
They have come to realize the obvious. That the climate is vastly more complex than any computer model could ever computate and the contribution of human generated CO2 in the atmosphere has a negligible and negative (more CO2 produces less warming) influence on temperature.
The people pushing this nonsense are the descendants of the ancient priests whose power was derived from duping the peasants into believing they could control the weather by placating the gods with appropriate sacrifices and rituals. It coincidentally worked just enough to convince the peasants to stay in line. They are the climate evangelists and those who dare to question them are climate heretics.
When you start with an opinion, find every piece of information you can that supports the opinion (and erase / deny / attack anything that does not support that opinion) , you are not a scientist. You are a control freak, power hungry, and ultimately lazy and greedy also. All of the ‘funding’ only goes towards proving your opinion. It is not research, it is Propaganda.
That's right! he science about the climate crisis is indeed unequivocal: The science proves there is no climate crisis.
Fuel shortages, food shortages, restricted medical care, doctor assisted suicide, abortion on demand, destroy the family, mutilate and molest your children, no borders, empty prisons, streets flooded with deadly drugs, silence religious expression, destroy our freedoms and our Constitutional Republic,..... (what'd'I miss?)
Man caused climate change is a THEORY and all scientific theories can be challenged. The article presents man caused climate change as a dogma which cannot be questioned and anyone who questions the dogma is a “denier” that is a heretic. Climate change is a cult religion, complete with an Inquisition, not any serious scientific theory.
Yes. This will be you in nine years if you don't send ALL of your money into the tax man.
(apologies to those with squeamish sensibilities)
Just WHO is to say what is "information" and "disinformation"? What if those sensible "climate deniers" are right and they own the "information" and all the "researchers" on the climate payroll are guilty of "disinformation"?
Who is the arbiter of truth and why?
Climate change, global warming, and global cooling are all hoaxes.
“The science about the climate crisis is unequivocal”, said she. Morons don’t need a lot of proof. We have had Climate Change for 4.7 billion yes. But she thinks the US is responsible.
Somebody tell Katie that all the ski areas in the west are opening early many with 4’ of snow.
It’s also sub zero weather in a wide swath of the Northwestern states which is a bit unusual this early.
Climate change my butt.
When any piece starts out with this, I walk away.