Posted on 10/28/2022 4:23:36 AM PDT by george76
I can’t see this being the reason he hanged himself. It is thirty day jail sentence and a $100,000 fine, ala Lori Laughlin.
I’d want to look at his books to see if he made any large bets on real estate that he lost his shirt over.
When this college admissions “scandal” was all over the news a while back, the media acted like it was the crime of the century. It was bizarre, given that these are celebrities, and probably liberal. I guess white and rich was the issue with the media glee.
“Who exactly was the victim of this ‘fraud?’”
Middle- and lower-class families whose kids could’ve been students based on merit and scores. These over-indulged rich kids took the other kids’ places.
His approach involved actual fraud.
But yeah, many have paid much more to get a dull kiddo into a college of choice.
Maybe I’m out of touch, but when did the University of San Diego become an elite university?
$250K to get your son into the University of San Diego? Is USD a secret portal to the world of the Masters of the Universe? Stanford maybe but USD, WTH?
Many of them had someone else take the SAT for their child. That is fraud and “injures” those that took the test legitimately.
I’d suggest the fraud was the college thinking they had taken in one more applicant for their legitimately qualified bucket, instead of one of their “otherwise of value” acceptance buckets. Though didn’t these fraudulent applicants involve the falsification of athletic achievement as well?
But selective “make an example” especially harsh sentences for widely perpetrated practices are usually dubious IMO.
Or if he even did it himself.
See Post #17. Those families couldn’t be fraud victims because they weren’t legally entitled to a place in the school.
That’s possible. Many of these business men walk the line of gray.
I don’t see how paying someone to get you into college is a crime. Did the agents get money that belonged to the schools? No.
“...they can’t be charged with fraud because there are no victims.”
I can only speak for myself, but my opinion of USC dropped a few notches upon learning that rich parents, any rich parents (not just alumni) can buy their kids a ticket to that school. So perhaps USC is a victim?
Bribing college officials has always been legal, as long as one did it in the form of a "donation." But Singer and company went beyond that.
3 years later he hangs himself ?
Something else’s may be going on..
>I have never understood this whole thing. The children of donors and alumni have always been given special consideration at colleges.
Colleges know it too, and they let the kids in because of the expected donations they get later. That said, those kids must have been dummmmmmmmb.
I think there is much more to this story, 3 years after the fact he hangs himself NOPE something more current is going on here!!!
The victims are the children whose parents are saying, by their actions, you are deficient.
Agree.
Sounds like Flaxman couldn’t live with that action.
If you cheat in school you are subject to disciplinary action by the school. They don’t call the police and have you charged with a crime.
A. The person who did not get into a particular college because this person boosted their child ahead in line with false credentials.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.