OR ..is Durham building states’ evidence to go up the chain??
A billion to one against. Like bagpipes Bob he’s just running cover for his masters.
When an FBI Lawyer admits to altering evidence to justify a FISA warrant and only gets a slap on the wrist of one year of probation, I'd say 'no' to your question.
A little late for that since he is letting the statute of limitations expire on pretty much everything.
OR ..is Durham building states’ evidence to go up the chain??
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Obviously. I studied up on Durham when he first surfaced. Very fascinating character. Very little publicly presented; he’s given one speech, which I read. He sees his mission as good vs evil, he’s never lost a case, his specialty is RICO and he has brought down mafia families and corrupt politicians. His son following in his footsteps, is specializing in gangs, particularly MS13.
Durham is very religious and those who know him hold him in the highest regard.
This goes into some detail.
The Durham Quiz
Take The Quiz And See How Much You Understand About What Durham’s Proven Thus Far
https://briancates.substack.com/p/the-durham-quiz
Who are you trying to convince? Durham is not going up any chain.
OR ..is Durham building states’ evidence to go up the chain?***
It has been relatively clear since the vapid plea deal with Kevin Clinesmith that Durham was intending to treat his Russiagate probe as exposing an op to fool the FBI. Such a strategy might require the public to believe that FBI personnel are some of the stupidest most gullible rubes in law enforcement... the same public that elected Joe Bitem, AOC, John Fetterman . . . Oh well, never mind.