Any explosion, any displacement of water, air, or across electromagnetic spectrum, would be redundantly and dynamically detected, and by different types of sensors, regardless of source.
The size and damage of a mere gas explosion vs non-gas explosion is mute.
No one can conclude from a single factor, and that single factor being an explosion along a gas line itself, what the cause actually was/is.
Other factors must be determined.
Having formerly been involved in determinative Russian sabotage investigations of both land and underwater structures and cables globally, andM in a highly politicized atmosphere, it would be very easy for me to jump to conclusions as well.
Especially after this —
NS1 and NS2 are immediately adjacent lines, until the union and diversion proximal NE of Bornholm, where all kinds of recent Russian underwater activity, and gas line “maintenance” involving Russia shutting off Russian gas, and not just has line naval vessels have been monitored and protested by Denmark and Sweden.
🇳🇱 Anyone remember this —
https://www.reuters.com/business/energy/new-russia-gas-halt-tighten-energy-screws-europe-2022-08-30/
And this —
🇳🇱 “...island of Bornholm.”
There is actually a whole lot more information, both OS and Classified.
But even after all that, no one can determine that a blast itself was sabotage, and done by who, just because there was a blast.
That is just plain stupod and foolish.
Neither individual bias itself, nor overwhelming consensus determines a fact, truth, or science. 🇺🇸🎚
I should not have included ought-six in that response #65.
I apologize ought-six, and your response was/is correct and prudent. 🇺🇸
I should not have included ought-six in that response #65.
I apologize ought-six, and your response was/is correct and prudent. 🇺🇸