But it's probably far riskier than artificially induced immunity or partial immunity.
Take Small Pox. If you survived Small Pox you were immune. But it was much safer to survive Cow Pox to gain immnity to Small Pox. And even safer to survive deactivated Cow Pox.
Covid Vaccines aren't as safe as we would like, but they still seem far safer than getting Covid. Even if surviving the latter gives you greater protection for the future.
And I've met people who have had Covid twice and one that had it 3 times. So surviving Covid doesn't give perfect immunity either.
Aren't as safe as we like? Understatement of the year. They provide no protection from getting the virus, transmitting it, preventing hospitalization, or dying from it. In fact, it is highly risky getting vaccinated especially getting boosted. SADS was not a thing before the vax came along.
Every person I know that has had Covid more than once, was fully Vaccinated, so maybe Vacinations makes one more prone to getting Covid again.
I’m Un vaccinated, because I had Covid before Vaccines were available and still had antibodies a year later, when Vaccines weren’t “stopping the Spread”.
Has anyone asked Fauci “How many healthy, unvaccinated people under 60 got Covid again and were Hospitailized and/or Died?
You know he has this data. Why doesn’t he just tell us. If its more than a tiny, miniscule percentage, I’ll get go vaccinated. It isn’t and I won’t.
“but they still seem far safer than getting Covid.”
Sorry don’t believe that anymore.
In the very beginning, Fauxi said masks don’t stop viruses (went to med school and already knew this to be true) and Covid was just a bad flu.
Month later, post Davos, he did a 180. (Check out Schwaabs comments on using an epidemic to start the Great Reset)
When I found out was exposed, took Ivermectin. Had a very mild cold and a mild fever for 2 days.
Recent study I think out of Brazil, showed Ivermectin is 92% effective in treating Covid.
Fauxi is our Mengele.
Not far safer than covid. No.
The only group of people that might be true for is those with weakened/compromised immune systems. A small, small demographic of the total population.
All vaccines are a risk, and the Covid shot is not a vaccine. The FDA “calls it a vaccine.” How did this magic happen? The FDA changed their definition of what a vaccine is! Why did they do this.
One must have all the data relative to risk benefit ratio to decide if one should take the shot. This data has not been forthcoming from the FDA. My question is why not?
The risk benefit ratio should also be categorized by how high the risk is by group, such as age, current illness, comorbidities, etc. This is how you determine who should get the shot or not. There is absolutely no reason for young and healthy people and in particular children to take this shot. The shot is more dangerous for this group than the disease. Why in the hell does the FDA want everyone to get the shot, even those at little risk?
I am a clinical pharmacist now retired. I took the first two shots from Pfizer. In the past I had great faith and trust in Pfizer, Astra-Zeneca, Merck, etc. I no longer trust them. If I had the limited data now available, I would not have taken the shots. I refuse to take the booster shots.