Posted on 08/31/2022 9:35:32 PM PDT by know.your.why
But department officials are not expected to file charges imminently, if they ever do. And the specific contents of the materials the government recovered in the search remain unclear — as does what risk to national security Mr. Trump’s decision to retain the materials posed.
(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...
Why put up a link that’s behind a paywall?
Trump had a legal and moral obligation to leave all his papers in the location for which the FBI had a fraudulently-obtained search warrant.
Theres no paywall on my end. Get AdBlock plus.
The anti-American Rats “suggest”
It took four moonbats to write this BS?
But it ‘sounds’ bad.
That’s all that matters to them since they have nothing, then or now.
Drip, drip, drip... The DOJ/FBI is leaking everything that fits their message. Judge should simply order everything unredacted and released.
More. damn. lies.
YEAH, THEY WERE MOVED AND HIDDEN RIGHT UNDER THE STUPID FBI’S NOSES.
How dumb does the fBI to think that we will swallow this bilge?
They have no respct for our inteligence.
That’s Crazy, the Facts Suggest...
A: So, the FBI/DOJ claim that documents at Mar-a-Largo may have been moved and they were told they could not access them when they were executing a subpoena. And to them, this raises questions of “obstruction”. Well, I have some questions for them...— Mark R. Levin (@marklevinshow) August 31, 2022
B: 1.The former president and his staff are free to look through the boxes, or even move them if the former president seeks access to them, so when you say they may have been moved, what are you claiming? That they were moved for the purpose of concealing them from you? How so?— Mark R. Levin (@marklevinshow) August 31, 2022
C: Where would they have moved the boxes to hide them from you? 2. If the subpoena you sought and received allowed you to review and remove documents, the idea that one or more lawyers prevents you for doing that is crazy.— Mark R. Levin (@marklevinshow) August 31, 2022
D: Were the lawyers armed, were they threatening to wrestle you to the ground, or what? How could they possibly prevent you from reviewing or removing documents if you had a lawful subpoena? It doesn’t make sense.— Mark R. Levin (@marklevinshow) August 31, 2022
E: You also state that a lawyer represented that you had all classified information. The implication you are trying to create is that you were lied to. So, let me get this straight...— Mark R. Levin (@marklevinshow) August 31, 2022
F: A licensed lawyer would put his freedom, career, and law license on the line by intentionally lying to the FBI about classified documents knowing full well that the FBI would eventually find him out?— Mark R. Levin (@marklevinshow) August 31, 2022
G: The federal government tracks its classified documents or is supposed to. This entire matter is utterly preposterous. And more so as time goes on.— Mark R. Levin (@marklevinshow) August 31, 2022
by: Maggie Haberman
LMAO
New York City joke:
How many New Yorkers does it take to screw in a lightbulb?
At least eight. One to screw it in and seven onlookers to shout “I’m not gonna get involved!” (1979!)
So an article in the NYT would take one fiction writer and three others to look up the spelling errors and grammar problems.
Leak, leak, leak.
Effin DOJ needs a serious enema. FIB needs to be completely disbanded. Shut down. Gone.
Corrupt!!!
Hidden, IN A DESk! What a great hiding place! He was sure trying to make sure no one ever found them there. /S
Well, The 40% who think Biden is doing a good job believes this bilge.
more #FakeNews
This is State Media coordinating with the FBI and DOJ to build a fake narrative.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.