Posted on 08/17/2022 4:23:28 AM PDT by george76
More than 40 percent of pregnant women who participated in Pfizer’s mRNA COVID vaccine trial suffered miscarriages, according internal Pfizer documents, recently released under court order. Despite this, Pfizer, and the Biden administration insisted that the vaccines were safe for pregnant women. Out of 50 pregnant women, 22 of them lost their babies, according to an analysis of the documents.
In a January court ruling, U.S. District Judge Mark Pittman of the Northern District of Texas, ordered the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to release around 12,000 documents immediately, and then 55,000 pages a month until all documents were released, totaling more than 300,000 pages.
The nonprofit group, Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency, sued the FDA last September, after the agency denied its Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request to expedite the release of mRNA vaccine review documents. In a November 2021 joint status report, the FDA proposed releasing only 500 pages of the documents a month, which would have taken up to 75 years.
Trial documents released in April revealed that Pfizer had to hire 1,800 additional full-time employees in the first half of 2021 to deal with “the large increase” of adverse reactions to its COVID vaccine.
The Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine was made available under the Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) on Dec. 11, 2020. By February of 2021, the company was seeing so many safety signals, including in pregnant and breastfeeding mothers, it had to immediately hire 600 employees to process the data.
A batch of documents released in late July showed that 44 percent of women who were pregnant during the trial suffered miscarriages, feminist author and journalist Dr. Naomi Wolf revealed on Steve Bannon’s War Room podcast. Wolf has been spearheading research and analysis of the Pfizer documents through her website Daily Clout.
In the past, only 10 to 15 percent of known pregnancies ended in miscarriage.
“Pfizer took those deaths of babies—those spontaneous abortions and miscarriages—and recategorized them as recovered/resolved adverse effects,” Wolf told Bannon. “In other words, if you lost your baby, it was categorized by Pfizer as resolved adverse event, like a headache that got better,” she added.
Wolf said adverse event cutoff report showing the miscarriages was March 13, 2021, and the FDA received the report on April 1, 2021.
Therefore, the FDA had this data nearly a year and a half ago, and instead raising an alarm, they, along with the CDC, went ahead and recommended the experimental injections for expectant mothers anyway.
“Over a year ago, the FDA received this report that out of 50 pregnant women, 22 of them lost their babies, and they did not say anything,” Wolf said, choking back tears. “Thus the FDA was aware of the horrifying rate of fetal death by the start of April 2021 and were silent.”
The CDC, as recently as last month, still recommended the experimental mRNA vaccines for pregnant and breastfeeding “people.”
“COVID-19 vaccination is recommended for all people 6 months and older. This includes people who are pregnant, breastfeeding, trying to get pregnant now, or might become pregnant in the future,” the CDC claims in a July 2022 post on its website. “CDC also recommends COVID-19 vaccines for infants 6 months and older who’s mother was vaccinated or had a COVID infection before or while pregnant.”
The FDA and CDC could conceivably claim they were unaware of high rate of miscarriages in the trial because Pfizer attempted to obscure the data.
“Pfizer notes the miscarriages as serious adverse events with moderate or severe toxicity ratings,” Wolf explained. “However, all of them were recategorized, by Pfizer, in the internal documents under the category of adverse events that were ‘recovered’ or ‘resolved.'”
Wolf noted that the Pfizer trial data correlates with the massive increase in miscarriages seen worldwide since the vaccine rollouts.
“If you extrapolate, globally, to all the pregnant women who are injected, it could explain what we’re seeing now of a baby die-off. 200 percent rise in neonatal deaths or spontaneous abortions and miscarriages in Scotland,” she said, adding, “86 babies died in Ontario when they usually have five or six [per quarter], and in Israel, a 34 percent rise of spontaneous abortions and miscarriages to vaccine.”
...
Back in January, three military doctors who had access to vaccination data in the DoD’s Defense Medical Epidemiology Database (DMED) disclosed that miscarriages and cancers among members of the US military had increased by about 300 percent in 2021 over the five year average.
These alarming safety signals were among several others brought to light by Thomas Renz, a member of America’s Frontline Doctors’ legal team, during a panel discussion convened by Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) in January.
The CDC, however, still maintains on its website that “evidence continues to build showing that: COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy is safe and effective.”
The agency also claimed “there is currently no evidence that any vaccines, including COVID-19 vaccines, cause fertility problems in women or men,” despite recent studies showing otherwise.
Dr. James Thorp, an physician MD board-certified in obstetrics and gynecology, as well as maternal-fetal medicine, said in a recent interview that he has seen a massive spike in fetal death and adverse pregnancy outcomes after the mass vaccination campaign began.
Dr. Thorp told Epoch Times he has practiced obstetrics for over 42 years and sees 6,000–7,000 high-risk OB patients a year.
The obstetrician declared that the use of the experimental COVID vaccines on expectant mothers “broke all the rules.”
“We have always been guided by that principle, that longstanding, six millennia principle—the golden rule of pregnancy—you never, ever use an investigational drug, a new substance, a new drug, a new vaccine—even if there’s a potential benefit,” he said. “You don’t ever use a new substance in pregnancy.”
Thorp said that in his practice, he’s seen a “significant increase” in problems, including “extraordinarily abnormal menstrual periods” before pregnancy.
“The vaccine I’m very concerned about and I do believe that in pregnancy, it’s contraindicated,” he said.
He said that his attempts to disclose these adverse events has been hampered by the imposition of gag orders on physicians and nurses that were imposed in September 2021.
...
In September of 2021, the American Board of Obstetrics and Gynecology (ABOG) put out a statement in support of the Federation of State Medical Boards’ (FSMB) contention that “providing misinformation about the COVID-19 vaccine contradicts physicians’ ethical and professional responsibilities.” The ABOG said physicians disseminating “misinformation” would be subject to “disciplinary actions, including suspension or revocation of their medical license.”
The ACOG, like the CDC, recommends the experimental injections for “pregnant people.”
“The fact that ABOG would recommend this “vaccine” in pregnancy is an abomination and may well be the greatest disaster in the history of obstetrics,” Thorp wrote in an article in the Gazette of Medical Sciences (GMS), titled: Patient Betrayal: The Corruption of Healthcare, Informed Consent and the Physician-Patient Relationship.
Our society is filled with very sick people who are in power.
even the unborn know its no good
Your covid abortion jab
a 2fer
Imagine the MSM interest in this if the president had an R in front. They might actually practice journalism.
Well, my neighbor says he won’t believe it until it comes out in the New York Times, or CNN. Wonder why they haven’t picked this up? I bet this news makes Faucci happy. Misinformation and all..he is opposed to fake news.
“In other words, if you lost your baby, it was categorized by Pfizer as resolved adverse event, like a headache that got better,” she added.
Group think permeates this ‘sham wow’ foisted upon us.
I thought pregnant women weren’t used in Pfizer’s CoupFlu vaxx trials...?
If you wanted to limit future populations, in the name of saving the planet (Climate Change), this is a good way to do it when you’re getting a 30-40% (minimum) reduction in births.
Houston, we have a problem. From January...
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-022-00031-8
“...When the vaccines were first administered to the public in late 2020, little was known about their effect on pregnant people, who hadn’t been represented in the original clinical trials that tested the shots. Although that is standard practice, it left pregnant people grappling with whether getting a jab was the best decision for themselves and their babies...”
So which was it, were they or weren’t they...?
No tests with pregnant males?
Bigots!
ASAP.
Is this a clinical trials vs studies thing again?
The studies I’ve seen were all done after the EUA and the stats were screwed with to get better results.
What Deep State, Big Med, and Big Pharma have done makes Mengele and Japan’s Unit 731 look like pikers.
What in Hades was going on?
Were pregnant women included in clinical trials or not?
Did Big Pharma lie in any way about the presence of pregnant women in clinical trials?
If pregnant women weren’t included, why not?
If they were, what were the results and did Big Pharma lie about the outcomes?
Names and addresses please. Let those who were injured take care of justice. Our “just-Us” clowns won’t. We promise to look the other way. Not even close to kidding.
Now for “Extra Happy Fun Points (/sarcasm )” it makes one wonder how many birth defects this crap caused.
Post marketing study. In this case, marketing means coercion and threat of job loss.
https://www.phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/reissue_5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.pdf (see page 12)
Typically Phase 4 is when they start testing on pregnant women. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phases_of_clinical_research#Phase_IV
Pfizer’s COVID-19 Clinical Trial Phase 1/2/3 in clinicaltrials.gov https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/study/NCT04368728
Trial start date April 29, 2020. Estimated completion date February 8, 2024
Moderna’s COVID-19 Clinical Trial Phase 3 in clinicaltrials.gov https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/study/NCT04470427
Trial start date July 27, 2020. Estimated completion date December 29, 2022
Normal for Phase 1/2/3 to be run concurrently? Doubt it. Normally, there is a Phase 4 which is when a portion of the public starts getting it and it’s monitored.
Thank you for your participation and may the odds be ever in your favor.
44 percent deaths. That is nearly as many babies killed as were deformed by the early 60s thalimide drug disaster. /spelling.
when will the nuremburg trials begin?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.