I just do not trust her. She has not given up being a dem. She may say common sense things but there is none of that left in the dem party.
I noticed her being labeld as an “R” on faux interview this am.
had no idea she had changed party?
Isn’t it a better country if good people are in both parties?
A broken clock is right twice a day, but in the end, it still doesn't work the way you want it to. Plenty of gullible people here on FR unfortunately.
Ho would you know?
Reagan and Trump were once democrats - when do you think they gave it up?
I don’t necessarily trust her either, but...there has been something of an epidemic of liberals who have come to see the excesses of the FJB Regime and the cancer of social justice and have distanced themselves from the current Democratic party. They’re still liberals, and still opposed to conservatives or libertarians on many or most things, but at least they’re seeing honestly the raw hypocrisy and lust for power that’s become the sole reason for the modern Democratic Party to exist.
So you end up with people like Tulsi Gabbard, Alan Dershowitz, Matt Taibbi, Glenn Greenwald, and Naomi Wolf. They’re not “us” but they’re at least people that can see what’s going on and respond honestly to it. I would’ve tended to put some of the older-school Democrats like Scoop Jackson or Daniel Moynihan in that same category. Not allies, but not enemies, not now.
}:-)4
Never trust a Democrat.
It’s weird though.
Tulsi Gabbard says demonstrably true things that seemingly no other modern Donkey Party officeholder in the U.S. dares to say. Granted, in most cases they don’t say these kinds of true things because their respective divorces from the truth and from reality have become final and complete (vis. Pelosi, Schumer, Biden, obama, Schiff, etc., all of whom have already clearly sold their souls to the devil himself). (as did Pelosi, Schumer, Biden, Obama, Schiff, etc., along ago).
But many others are also keeping silent for fear of destroying their political futures.
What kind of political future is Tulsi Gabbard envisioning for herself? One wonders.
She’s still to the Right of Mitt and Cheney.
“I just do not trust her.”
Why bother announcing that. What she said is true and it is in line with what she has stated for a long time. Take it for what it is worth, and evidently Fox thinks she has clout.
No one is asking you to have a personal relationship with her.
Ditto.
Like all women, a moment of clarity, common sense and logic is unpredictably, unexpectedly clouded/erased by emotions and or PMS.
IMHO she is sort of a Libertarian with a left wing tilt. She is anti gun and that does it for me.
And that is partly why they got rid of her. I wouldn’t vote for her but they tossed her when she didn’t tow their party line.
She went to Syria, on her own, and did her own “investigation”‘ into the use of chemical weapons.
Interesting that all the people she talked to blamed it all on the guys that the regime, McCain and Graham were supporting.l
She put a bullseye on her own back after that and they got rod of her.
Take away the fraud that took place and she was the only one that could have given Donald Trump a run for his money in ‘16.
I’m with you. She’s a WEF Young Global Leader and Tucker is the ultimate limited hangout.
“I just do not trust her. She has not given up being a dem. She may say common sense things but there is none of that left in the dem party.”
That’s how I feel/felt about Dick Morris!
I don't really care if she means it. I am glad that she says it. That's enough. She's not running for anything and I'm not dating her so I'm not too worried about what her secret thoughts are. She may be an opportunist but for the moment she's saying the right things so good for her.
Tulsi is WEF - so she is at best controlled opposition. She may honestly wish her party was better than it is, but she will ultimately back the Globalist agenda - every time.