That’s may be true, FR friend. They’re trying to rectify that.
I think she is being sarcastic. If baby killers (including a lot of so-called men) say it’s their right to kill then it’s alright for women to have the right to defend themselves, since they are frailer and need some advantages. Killings are not going away. Since the beginning of time, the defenseless suffer the most.
That’s the take I got. :-)
Men as a gender don’t embrace a false doctrine like women do with their “Women’s Movement” that justifies killing babies.
Women tend to be just like what Melvin Udall said - they tend to be irrational and unaccountable.
Almost every time infanticide is brought up as part of “women’s rights” the woman either discounts it as something needing to be “rectified” but never is nor can be, and/or she brings up the man as the culprit as some kind of justification for their rebellion (against God and man). A woman’s vulnerability does not extend to justifying today’s abject rebellion and mass murder.
Irrational and unaccountable.
Mass murder is part of the fruit that reveal s the real source of “women’s rights” and the “women’s movement” - the serpent of old AKA Satan who is able to deceive a rebellious woman.
That is why the Bible says women need to be subject to the man. Eve, like the women of today, was and is deceived by the serpent, whereas Adam, like today’s men, was and is not deceived but goes along with Eve’s program anyway.
No, the “women’s movement” and “women’s rights” are just a warmed over version of Eve’s rebellion and alignment with Satan from the beginning.
God loves women (and so do I) but their rebellion is to be condemned.