It’s not evasion. Your post essentially said that if someone agreed with the Checken leader’s statement about faggots and sodomites he is siding with radical Islamists. If that isn’t what you meant to say, just take the time to write more clearly.
Yes, it is. If you try to deflect an argument using a point not made in your opponent's original claim, that's evasion.
Your post essentially said that if someone agreed with the Checken leader’s statement about faggots and sodomites
No you are evading again. I never mentioned gays. I said that when a Muslim talks about waging a holy war for Allah and then does it, that makes him a radical Islamist.
This guy is a Jihadi. On top of that, he says he wants to go all the way to Warsaw. So the guy you say isn't a radical religious muslim nut, wants to go 430 miles into Poland to fight NATO soldiers.