[DSH]

What’s the harm in Pence focusing on four big swing states like PA, GA, MI, and WI, entertaining objections to the validity of the slate-selection election (election day) tallies based on the overwhelming stink of corruption arising from the city centers of those states, and send the envelopes back to those states demanding answers regarding what appear to be seemingly coordinated corruptions or irregularities common to all four states, such as unexplained cessation of vote counting when it appeared that Trump was winning, followed by middle-of-the-night resumption of counting resulting in people waking up to see that Biden had strangely seizing the lead in each such state literally overnight.

What's the harm? The harm is that neither Amendment XII nor the Electoral Count Act permits the Vice President to do what you propose. In other words, your scenario would constitute wholly lawless action on Pence's part.

Given his credentials, John Eastman is clearly a smart man. But he's also a self-evident crackpot.

[one guy in new jersey]

The Constitution does not forbid it, and the VP need not budge unless and until moved to do so.

The power to certify the tally is said to be merely ministerial, but I think that is only because egregious stank like we saw arise out of PA, MI, WI and GA in November, 2020 has never been matched with a sufficiently masculinr VP possessing righteous anger and a concomitant willingness to devise and take proportionate action to save our country, non-VP critics be damned.