[E. Pluribus Unum]

How would they know it is a “baseless assertion” if they never investigated it?

[rlmorel]

"...Baseless Assertion..."
"...Baseless Assertion..."
"...Baseless Assertion..."
"...Baseless Assertion..."
"...Baseless Assertion..."
"...Baseless Assertion..."

[Freedom4US]

It’s been Debunked, because they said it was debunked. Science!

[FLT-bird]

Because they want it to be baseless. It doesn’t suit their politics at all for it to be substantive. So therefore it can’t be. Pravda and Izvestia provided the template for this kind of reporting a long time ago.

[heshtesh]

How would they know it is a “baseless assertion” if they never investigated it?

Cannot be expressed enough times..........

[Still Thinking]

I also love how they’re always saying that the fraud claims were ‘disproven in court’ when what really happened was that most courts found excuses not to take the cases. Standing, etc.