The J6 Committee Members Claim They Have Evidence of Incitement. They Don’t. Here’s How We Know.

PJ Media ^ | 06/08/2022 | Matt Margolis

[SeekAndFind]

The radical left has been falsely accusing Trump of inciting the Capitol riot for over a year now, and their upcoming televised hearings later this week prove that their main objective is to keep the riot in people’s minds even though Americans have long since moved on.

But the Democrats and RINOs on the committee are still hoping they can exploit the riot and get people to blame Trump and the Republicans. In the year the committee has been active, they’ve failed to produce any evidence of Trump’s culpability in the riot, but that’s not stopping them from claiming otherwise. In fact, one committee member is even saying they “found evidence” of incitement.

“The select committee has found evidence about a lot more than incitement here, and we’re gonna be laying out the evidence about all of the actors who were pivotal to what took place on Jan. 6,” Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.) told the Washington Post.

Raskin claims the partisan committee has evidence of “concerted planning and premeditated activity” and that the forthcoming hearings will “tell the story of a conspiracy to overturn the 2020 presidential election and block the transfer of power.”

YAWWWWWWWN ! .....

The left has a tendency to claim to have (or have seen) evidence of something when they have not. Remember how Adam Schiff claimed he saw evidence of Trump/Russia collusion? But, aside from that, the January 6 Committee has a credibility problem that cannot be ignored here.

First of all, various text messages released by the committee have actually exonerated Trump, but have been falsely characterized as incriminating. In fact, they even doctored text messages to make them look incriminating when they weren’t.

[SeekAndFind]

Further, Raskin seemed a little less confident about Trump’s role. When he was asked if Trump was involved in the so-called, conspiracy, he was curiously less absolute. “I think that Donald Trump and the White House were at the center of these events,” he said. “That’s the only way really of making sense of them all.”

Then Raskin added that “people are going to have to make judgments themselves about the relative role that different people played.”

Gee, this sounds like the absolute opposite of the narrative we’ve been hearing from the committee since its inception: that there was a conspiracy to overthrow the government and Trump was behind it all.

Raskin has essentially admitted they have nothing on Trump, and that the committee is basically crossing its fingers, hoping that people will just blame him for it anyway.

[Principled]

i kind of hope they’ll get ambushed and lose the “live” tv thing anyway ... although I’m not watching.

[Bob434]

Fake news! Schifty Schiff said that there is ample evidence of guilt, therefore it is true /s

[READINABLUESTATE]

“tell the story of a conspiracy to overturn the 2020 presidential election and block the transfer of power.”

The notion that a couple hundred unarmed protesters could topple the government of the United States is hilarious.

[JohnnyP]

If only Ray Epps would come forward and admit that Trump put him up to it and has the emails to prove it.

[MomwithHope]

What a bunch of maroons!

[AnthonySoprano]

[Cautious Optimism]

After all the claims he made, shouldn’t Adam Schiff be indicted for withholding evidence ?

[euram]

Ratskin and Schitt, what a pair of natural-born liars.

[cld51860]

What’s to keep these criminals from just making something up/manufacturing it? I put nothing past these cretins.

[eyeamok]

And if the Republicrats had ANY Decency whatsoever, they would EXPEL Every one of them from Congress After Finding them in Contempt and referring them for Criminal Prosecution if they manage to win control

[avital2]

impeachment 3 - Trump is still their biggest fear.

[lurk]

Nothing but inference and suggestion. They’re hurrying this in order to create electoral traction.

[Lion Den Dan]

If President Trump had called for an insurrection, we would not be calling Pudding Joe (piss be upon him) president.

[Salvavida]

They have an ace in the hole: a stupid, biased DC jury.

A lightbulb flashed when Michael Sussman was acquitted.

[Reddy]

When I hear the name Jamie Raskin, it makes me think of Carol Baskin.

[ProudVet97]

Ratskin and Schitt, what a pair of natural-born liars and lovers!

[Sacajaweau]

Everyone of us have discussed a matter only to find that something similar came about. It doesn’t make you complicit or active.

[rktman]

Reference to NO SMOKING GUN:

https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/4068832/posts

No doubt Adam 💩 4brains has something hidden away.

[pnz1]

They clearly don’t understand that at this disaster point we’re at, people may not be very sympathetic to their cause. After all, this administration is pretty much driving the US off a cliff it seems.