Kemp was polling at 52% the day before the election. But the real difference here is that Kemp was controversial. It may have been legit, but then again it smells rancid that he would beat Purdue that badly, without the help of Democrats possibly voting for him. Ga. has open primaries. Besides that Pence was supporting Kemp, which by all standards, should have been a poisonous bite for him.
Maybe, maybe not. But the suggestion that “no one” ever gets 74% in an election is just utter nonsense - no person with a modicum of knowledge of politics would utter such a statement.
Yup. Whoever thought that opening primaries to Democrats was a good idea should be shot. It’s an open invitation to Democrats to pick the weakest candidate.
Saw an article yesterday (Washington Post I think) which explicitly featured Democrats admitting they were voting for Kemp and Raffensperger just to hurt Trump.
At this point, I advise everyone who wants to support Trump to vote for the Democrat in the General election.
Unless you punish backstabbing people, you will not get others to stop backstabbing.
The only way a small minority (people against Kemp and Raffensberger) can have influence is by throwing their weight on the balance between two foes.
To get rid of Kemp and Raffensberger you will have to vote for the Democrat, and then the lesson will be learned that backstabbing has consequences.