“the only remaining COVID-19 entry restriction has been a requirement for testing within 24 hours of entry into Denmark for persons who have not been vaccinated with a recognized vaccine or previously infected”
*or previously infected*
Amazing. They are clearly recognizing natural immunity, something I do not believe our FedGov “public health” authorities have done.
" They are clearly recognizing natural immunity"
Germany is too..
*or previously infected*
Amazing. They are clearly recognizing natural immunity....
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Let’s assume that being “previously infected” actually mattered in what Denmark or some other jurisdiction was doing. How would this be determined? The piece didn’t give any details so I suppose one would have to dig into their ‘Ministry of Health’ documents to find out. One would logically presume that if a previous infection mattered, there must be some sort of formal recognition of one having been sick, no?
- Does one need to have been sick and seen a doctor at some point who declared “yup you got the Wuflu?”.... and then provided a document that attested to this?
- Would a person have to provide the results of an antibody test that showed they had been previously sick and recovered? How reliable are those tests, can they differentiate from those who did get EGT’d and what happens after some time has elapsed? The WuFlu has been around long enough that there are people who recovered from it 2 years ago….
- Or it just based on some self-declarative thing? “Yup…. Got sick a while ago, didn’t feel that bad so I never actually went to see the doctor but I know it was the WuFlu since I knew others around me who got sick with it.”
These things just open up endless questions….