Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: G Larry; Oldeconomybuyer; frogjerk

If somebody doesn’t want to serve me, then I definitely want to eat somewhere else. I’m like, “Well, harumph, good day to you, sir! I mean, good day to you, you stuck-up, hateful, loserly smeller of other people’s bottoms!”

Hypothetical Q: What are some possible outcomes of FORCING PEOPLE TO PREPARE AND SERVE YOU FOOD????


9 posted on 02/22/2022 7:37:34 AM PST by Scarlett156 (Someone with "comedian" on his social media profile is invariably a self-hating sadistic loser.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Scarlett156

The intended outcome of this Colorado law is to ensure strict adherence to current dogma. It does not matter that the Supreme Court has ruled that states must also abide by “Congress shall make no law...”

In other words, the idea is to force people to NOT follow their religious beliefs so the state can better control them.


14 posted on 02/22/2022 7:42:11 AM PST by packagingguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: Scarlett156

Um, maybe the food includes things from other people’s smelly bottoms, just as if somebody asked the waiter to take his dinner back to the kitchen for improvement at a restaurant.


34 posted on 02/22/2022 8:44:24 AM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Florida: America's new free zone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson