That is true, but not according to WOKE from Hell "fluid" ideology. And SCOTUS has effectively equated amoral aspects as race, color, ethnicity with a immoral behavior, as if endocannibalism was a protected practice as being part of an ethnic class, and thus refusing to create a work of art for it as a commercial artist was a racist crime.
"And if one is such a racist that they won’t build a website for black people, let the market have its say on such bigotry. I think there’s plenty of market for someone who won’t bake an LGBQake."
But that could extend to a Muslim mechanic refusing to fix a broken vehicle of a Christian when no one else is around. The government cannot forbid matters of the heart and faith, but immoral actions only. Unless a difference is made btwn amoral aspects as race as well as beliefs, moral or not, and that of moral actions/practices with the latter being a basis for discrimination (so that a patriot cannot refuse to sell a flag to a liberal, unless he knows the intent is to desecrate it and yet which the state may allow) - and morality is defined by the Bible as understood by the NT church - then evil actions will be called good, or at least protected.
That is true, but not according to WOKE from Hell “fluid” ideology.
***Then it is STILL true. In fact, it’s even MORE true now.