Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Graham: Nominating a Black woman to the Supreme Court wouldn't be affirmative action
The hill ^ | 01/30/2022 | Joseph Choi

Posted on 01/30/2022 8:34:34 AM PST by ChicagoConservative27

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-75 next last
To: ChicagoConservative27

There are only 12 persons on the SC. How do you fairly represent all races, creeds religion and sexes in the U.S. with only 12 persons?


41 posted on 01/30/2022 9:41:09 AM PST by throwthebumsout
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Some of the women he supposedly is considering AREN’T qualified.


42 posted on 01/30/2022 9:41:21 AM PST by Flaming Conservative ((Pray without ceasing))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

saying he was in support of making U.S. institutions “look like America.”

/\
\/

WHICH America Linda ?

The USA

or

The USSA ?

The American majority
or
The Global Communist psycho few ?

.


43 posted on 01/30/2022 9:41:44 AM PST by cuz1961 (USCGR Veteran )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Not A Snowbird

Racist politicians...again.


44 posted on 01/30/2022 9:42:39 AM PST by joma89 (Buy weapons and ammo, folks, and have the will to use them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Not A Snowbird

Time for Lindsy to go.
A total focus on skin color and gender can be nothing but an affirmative action nomination. Disgusting.


45 posted on 01/30/2022 9:44:24 AM PST by sjmjax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

He’s such a dolt!


46 posted on 01/30/2022 9:44:50 AM PST by Joann37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lodi90

Can’t happen soon enough as far as I’m concerned.


47 posted on 01/30/2022 9:48:50 AM PST by vpintheak (Live free, or die!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Joann37

Blame the S.C. republican party, last election S.C. had a choice between old dog sht and fresh hillary clinton backed dog shit .


48 posted on 01/30/2022 9:49:29 AM PST by Ikeon (40 years ago the military had blanket partys, now it's pillow fights)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Okay, then. How about “identity politics?”


49 posted on 01/30/2022 9:57:43 AM PST by Fester Chugabrew (No nation that sanctions the wholesale slaughter of its unborn citizens is fit to endure.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: throwthebumsout

12 ?

Ummm not yet…….


50 posted on 01/30/2022 10:11:14 AM PST by Romans Nine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Gee whiz, dickhead, no one that the bidenites have mentioned, so far, is remotely qualified...

Therefore, it is affirmative action at its worst...


51 posted on 01/30/2022 10:32:28 AM PST by SuperLuminal (Where is another Sam Adams now that we desperately need him?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Romans Nine

Oops!


52 posted on 01/30/2022 10:35:41 AM PST by throwthebumsout
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27
"...get bent..."

I would say, don't give him any ideas, but that is likely a favorite activity of his.

53 posted on 01/30/2022 10:41:02 AM PST by rlmorel (Nothing can foster principles of freedom more effectively than the imposition of tyranny.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

LOL, I heard someone the other day refer to her as “The Wide Latina”...:)


54 posted on 01/30/2022 10:42:04 AM PST by rlmorel (Nothing can foster principles of freedom more effectively than the imposition of tyranny.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

It’s affirmative action when you declare the only requirements ahead of time.


55 posted on 01/30/2022 10:50:12 AM PST by Old Yeller (1776 em all. Let God sort it out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

I think the next Supreme Court justice should be a white man. It’s about time this under-appreciated minority got a little something thrown their way.


56 posted on 01/30/2022 10:52:04 AM PST by SamAdams76 (I am 24 days away from outliving John Hughes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C210N

I nominate Carol Swain. Former law professor at Vanderbilt. Oops, she falls into the #1 category.


57 posted on 01/30/2022 10:52:06 AM PST by Old Yeller (1776 em all. Let God sort it out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Old Yeller
It’s affirmative action when you declare the only requirements ahead of time.

Trump did it when he nominated Barrett. He said he was going to appoint a woman.

58 posted on 01/30/2022 12:13:50 PM PST by semimojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: aquila48

Linda will vote for whomever Biteme nominates...


59 posted on 01/30/2022 12:27:55 PM PST by sarge83
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27
Who is Lindsey's GF?

Is Lindsey gay?

He's not married...

Not there's anything wrong with that...

But he's a public "servant".

We should know these things.....

60 posted on 01/30/2022 12:32:13 PM PST by Osage Orange (1961 VW Two Door Truck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-75 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson