Posted on 01/15/2022 3:26:49 AM PST by Texas Fossil
Who is paying Labron James more, the NBA or China?
Who does James protect and defend more from critics?
Just because someone has a job that has a paper trail doesn’t mean that’s their only paying employment source………
He was required to be vaccinated to attend a meeting abroad.
On 2nd injection he was very sick.
He would not have been vaccinated except he was required to attend the meeting.
Dr. Malone is one of the good guys.
Yes. Agree.
I see NO Evidence of him changing sides.
He does not need to.
He has spent a lot of effort to gather support of doctors world wide to be on the right side.
Political Junkie Too wrote: “Because Fauci holds a high-level government position paid by taxpayers and is subject to financial disclosure and conflict-of-interest regulations.”
That isn’t the point. There have been many accusations about where Fauci got his wealth. Isn’t it also appropriate to inquire if Malone is financially motivated/benefiting from his anti-vaccine crusade? For example, America’s Front Line Doctors:
https://time.com/6092368/americas-frontline-doctors-covid-19-misinformation/
My point is, there have been several who’ve accused Fauci of being motivated by what profits Fauci. That’s fair, but then there are many others who should be subjected to the same investigation. BTW, I have no problem with making a living, I do like to know if someone is taking their positions based upon how it profits them. It’s even common on this board to accuse posters like myself of being paid.
You can question it, but the number is not unreasonable for him in the normal course of his career.
-PJ
Political Junkie Too wrote: “My point is that the net worth you reported is not unusual for someone of Malone’s stature at this point in his life. You can question it, but the number is not unreasonable for him in the normal course of his career.”
Never said it was unusual. Just said we should treat both fairly.
To be fair, people can be, and often are, motivated by things other than money.
Pride, revenge, ego, power. Or sincerely wanting to warn people of danger.
We've all seen these operating in the world.
It is a little suss that Malone claims only that he has no conflicting financial interest, as if that could be the only motivation, good or bad.
To be fair, people can be, and often are, motivated by things other than money.
Pride, revenge, ego, power. Or sincerely wanting to warn people of danger.
We've all seen these operating in the world.
It is a little suss that Malone claims only that he has no conflicting financial interest, as if that could be the only motivation, good or bad.
Bushwhacked by Alex Berenson on Fox News-Robert W Malone MD, MS
bsalom01 wrote: “To be fair, people can be, and often are, motivated by things other than money.”
I’ve seen some speculation that Malone is motivated by a belief that he hasn’t received the acclaim to which he is entitled.
The stories keep getting modified I notice.
The first one was he didn’t know how bad it was.
That quickly changed (because it shows a lack of genius that Malone is touted to be) to because of his age and health history.
Now we have because he wanted to attend meetings abroad.
Here’s the real fact………it’s doesn’t matter why he chose to get vaccinated.
It’s his choice. Just like it doesn’t matter why someone chooses not to get vaccinated.
Malone had his reasons for getting vaccinated, like everyone does, vaccinated or not.
But, if he’s gonna put himself out there and claim eating Reese’s Peanut Butter Cups is awfully unhealthy because of the high sugar and fat content while he’s enjoying a Reese’s Peanut Butter Cup himself……….it’s not going to be ignored.
Even if his reason for eating Reese’s Peanut Butter Cup is because they taste good or he’s hypoglycemic, or he’s really hungry.
That is Lehmans take. She compared him to Walter White.
I am not here to argue with you.
You have shown ZERO that convinces you really know anything about Dr. Malone.
Are you an expert in the field? I doubt it.
I give the presumption of innocence, therefore my first instinct is to not question the source of Malone's income unless something arises to plant the seed of doubt. An expert in his field raising questions about the efficacy and safety of a drug is not enough, in and of itself, to assume guilt of some sort.
I would give the same presumption of innocence to Fauci, if it were not for reports like this one from July 14, 2021 as reported in The Federalist: What Did Fauci Know And When? His Emails Point To Panic, Lies, And A Possible Cover-Up.
Recently released e-mails show that Dr. Anthony Fauci knew key facts about the origins of COVID-19 in January 2020. But at that critical time, when the country was first learning about the virus, Dr. Fauci chose not to share the facts with Americans. Instead, he acted to conceal them.On January 31, 2020, at 10:32 p.m., Dr. Fauci received an email from British researcher, Dr. Kristian Andersen. Dr. Andersen has received millions of dollars in grants from the NIH. In the email, he warned Dr. Fauci:
[O]ne has to look really closely at all the sequences to see that some of the features (potentially) look engineered . . . Eddie [Holmes], Bob [Garry], Mike [Ferguson] and myself all find the genome inconsistent with evolutionary theory.Two hours later, at 12:29 a.m. on February 1, Dr. Fauci emailed his long-time deputy, Dr. Hugh Auchincloss. In the email, Dr. Fauci attached a paper written by Dr. Ralph Baric and Dr. Zhengli-Li Shi – the so-called “bat woman” from Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV). The paper highlighted taxpayer-funded gain-of-function research on coronaviruses conducted by the WIV. Dr. Fauci told Dr. Auchincloss:It is essential that we speak this [morning]. Keep your cell phone on . . . read this paper . . . you will have tasks today that must be done.Urgency. Intensity.
Two hours later, at 2:48 a.m., Dr. Fauci sent another email, to Dr. Robert Kadlec. Dr. Kadlec was the Trump-appointed Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response at the Department of Health and Human Services. Attached to this email was an article that downplayed the lab leak and advocated for an evolutionary origin to COVID-19. Dr. Fauci simply wrote:
Bob: This came out today. Gives a balanced view.No urgency. No intensity.
Why was Dr. Fauci so concerned when emailing his deputy but so calm when emailing his boss? Why didn’t he send Dr. Kadlec the Baric-Shi paper? The paper that supported the original message from Dr. Andersen that COVID-19 looked engineered, was inconsistent with evolutionary theory, and linked American tax dollars to gain of function research at the WIV.
Later that morning, at 11:47 a.m., Dr. Auchincloss replied to Dr. Fauci:
The paper you sent me says the experiments were performed before the gain-of-function pause but have since been reviewed and approved by NIH. Not sure what this means since [we are] sure that no coronavirus work has gone through the P3 framework. [We] will try to determine if we have any distant ties to this work abroad.Wow! Dr. Auchincloss’ email confirms Dr. Fauci’s worst fear. American tax dollars funded gain of function research at the WIV and that research didn’t go through proper oversight (the P3 framework).
[more about what happened next at the link above]
We learned back in July 2021 that Fauci was acting inconsistently, apparently playing both ends (his boss and his direct reports) against the middle (himself). The rest of the link provides more details.
Now, just the other day, new facts are emerging about this event from recently found emails released by Rep. Jim Jordan and the House Oversight and Reform Committee. These emails begin to reveal what the rest of the above article questioned.
Having known about this story since July 2021, this is why I lean towards suspecting Fauci, but lean towards not suspecting Malone. Fauci was acting like someone with something to hide, and Malone was not.
I think I've treated both of them fairly, given the facts known at the time and facts recently revealed.
-PJ
“ I am not here to argue with you.
You have shown ZERO that convinces you really know anything about Dr. Malone.
Are you an expert in the field? I doubt it.”
———————————————————————————————————————————
Didn’t think we were arguing.
I don’t need to know intimate details about Malone to know what he shows publicly.
So his school grades, lab discoveries, favorite color, don’t matter when speaking of basic human behavior.
“Do as I say, not as I do.”, is a basic flaw in one’s recommendation, or rules.
Am I an expert in what field? Peanut Butter Cups? No, not really.
But I know good leaders tend to lead by example.
As with Malone, we all get vaccinated or chose not to for our own reasons.
Malone doesn’t help his or your cause by being vaccinated (for whatever reason) and continues to claim how dangerous they are and why everyone else should avoid them.
One more item, if Malone truly believed his own mantra, wouldn’t he be on the path to death right now? If ADE is real, why isn’t Malone trying to cure it or why does he never speak about his own pending doom?
You know, to help out others that got vaccinated to attend meetings or whatever this week’s reason is.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.