Dr. Malone, Peter Navarro publish 'declaration of independence' from vax mandates

Prominent vaccine inventor Dr. Robert Malone and former Trump economic adviser Peter Navarro have published a "declaration of independence" from the federal government's forced universal vaccination policy, contending the "quasi-vaccines" in use are significantly riskier than public health officials have disclosed.

They argue in the Washington Times that, unlike smallpox and polio, a vaccine cannot eliminate a respiratory disease like COVID-19.

Yet, amid growing evidence the "leaky" vaccines don't stop infection or transmission and can make people even more vulnerable to COVID-19, "the Pied Pipers of forced vaccinations are demanding ever more 'booster' jabs" to fight the omicron variant, which while highly contagious generally produces mild symptoms, if any, they write.

"The virus is now so thoroughly embedded in global populations that, like the common cold and flu, it will be with us for the foreseeable future," Malone and Navarro say. "It is long past time to substitute Dr. Fauci’s increasingly frantic 'vaccine' as a silver bullet fantasy for this reality: The genetic vaccines and overall Fauci/Biden policies have utterly failed to meet their public health objectives — even as life insurance executives such as OneAmerica CEO J. Scott Davison are on fire concerning the overall high mortality rates they are observing in their data."

This is not a vaccine. The jab using mRNA delivers mRNA in a nano lipid or fat envelope to a cell. It’s a medical device designed to stimulate a cell into becoming a pathogen creator by creating the known to be harmful spike protein.

Vaccine is a defined term in law and under CDC and FDA standards. A vaccine has to stimulate an immunity in the person receiving it. And it must also disrupt transmission.

That’s not what this is. Even the drug manufacturers admit the jab or its mRNA does not stop transmission. The jab is a treatment, but if it’s discussed as a treatment it would not get the sympathetic ear of public health officials because people would ask what other treatments there are.

And alternative treatments would hamper FDA’s ability to issue emergency approval of the jabs. Defining the narrative with the term vaccine is a sucker punch to open and free discourse. “Vaccine” throws the discussion into one of pro/con vaccine.

The jab is a mechanical device in the form of a very small packet of technology inserted into the human system to activate the cell to become a pathogenetic spike protein manufacturing site. No basis exists to stipulate this is a vaccine.

Simply put, this is a chemical pathogen device meant to unleash chemical pathogen production within a cell. It’s a medical device, not a drug. The jab is not a living or biologic system, but rather a physical technology that just happens to come in the size of a molecular package.

Follow the money .... Gates buys and pushes vaccines

and about 30% are hesitant to take the vaccine.

Gates buys a testing company. CDC now pulls the plug on the current Covid test (which could not distinguish between Covid and Influenza).

Now the government requires the vaccine hesitant to get tested. .... who makes the money in this scenario?

Well said. And that is what they do too. My son in law, a nurse, recently had a bad flu. They made him test three times trying to prove Covid. All three negative. But they did not want negative and kept trying for a positive. Then they tried to get him to sign that he accepts a diagnosis as covid even though he had three negative tests. He caught the scam and gave them the finger.

This is what they are doing to get the extra fed covid dollars.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.