Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Constitutional amendment proposal would repeal federal income tax and the 16th Amendment which authorizes it
GovTrack ^ | 12/14/2021 | Jesse Rifkin

Posted on 12/21/2021 6:59:33 AM PST by EBH

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

1 posted on 12/21/2021 6:59:33 AM PST by EBH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: EBH

How about Term Limits for all the Critters


2 posted on 12/21/2021 7:01:11 AM PST by butlerweave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EBH

Sere tagline.


3 posted on 12/21/2021 7:01:58 AM PST by unixfox (Abolish Slavery, Repeal the 16th Amendment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EBH

Only if it actually elimiates the wage tax that is illegally included as income now. wage taxes as direct taxes should only be lawfully collected and apportioned not as they are today.


4 posted on 12/21/2021 7:07:33 AM PST by kvanbrunt2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EBH

“If you think about the 16th Amendment, they had to change the Constitution to begin taxing income. Initially, that was only going to target a handful of families in America. And now look at it,” Rep. Davidson said on C-SPAN’s Washington Journal.>>> this statement is wrong. The federal government can tax anything. Direct taxes must be apportioned. For the income direct tax the constitution was changed to get rid of the apportionment requirement. Wages were added by the courts in “Glenshaw Glass” which allowed direct taxes on appurtenances to wealth with out the apportionment. clearly unconstitutional and corrupt.


5 posted on 12/21/2021 7:10:59 AM PST by kvanbrunt2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EBH

The reason the founders required a direct tax to be apportioned is that it would end up being a head tax. That even to this day is the only lawful enactment of any direct tax to a citizen of the several states. except for a tax on incomes derived from a source. 16th.


6 posted on 12/21/2021 7:14:57 AM PST by kvanbrunt2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EBH

Income taxes pay for abortions, sex changes, bombing civilians, Wuhan bio-weapons development.
In short, they tax us to kill us.
It’s about time we do something about that.


7 posted on 12/21/2021 7:15:10 AM PST by conservativeimage (Spark up a fire. Light up this place. Burn out this darkness and tear down the fear.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EBH

Anyone who thinks this has a chance of happening is overdue for a reality check.


8 posted on 12/21/2021 7:15:48 AM PST by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EBH

That has about as much of a chance of passing as Chris Christie has on becoming president, of anything.


9 posted on 12/21/2021 7:16:34 AM PST by Robert DeLong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: butlerweave
How about Term Limits for all the Critters

Take away the money pot that motives political careers and term limits become irrelevant.

10 posted on 12/21/2021 7:16:47 AM PST by fwdude (My pronouns are "F*ck, Joe, Biden." Use them when addressing me or else. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: EBH

I would like to point out that the Fed Gov’t only gets about 50% of revenues from income tax and about 50% of what the govt does is unconstitutional. Start eliminating intrusive agencies. If some of the states like them, they can institute those agencies at the state level.


11 posted on 12/21/2021 7:21:29 AM PST by gspurlock (http://www.backyardfence.wordpress.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EBH

The 16th amendment was not to authorize a tax on income from wages and salaries. Wages and salaries are considered an excise and as such were already subject to direct taxation. Rather it was to allow taxation on capital, such as, capital gains, stock dividends and interest on bonds. Repeal the 16th amendment and your wages will still be taxed but Wall Street will not be.


12 posted on 12/21/2021 7:26:47 AM PST by Petrosius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Petrosius
Understanding the 16th Amendment

The text of the 16th Amendment is as follows:

The Congress shall have the power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several States, and without regard to any census or enumeration.

13 posted on 12/21/2021 7:31:43 AM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Petrosius
The first permanent federal income tax was levied in 1913: the schedule consisted of seven brackets, with rates ranging from 1%, on the first $20,000 of income, to 6% on income exceeding $500,000. The government raised a total of $28.3 million. (These figures are not adjusted for inflation.) 1913

The year the first permanent federal income tax was levied.

What Did the 16th Amendment Accomplish?

The 16th Amendment allowed Congress to enact the first nationwide income tax, which is now the Federal government's largest source of revenue. Prior to that point, most Federal revenue came from tariffs.

14 posted on 12/21/2021 7:33:45 AM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: EBH
Former Rep. Sam Johnson (R-TX3) introduced versions of this constitutional amendment in 1996, 1997, 1999, 2001, and 2003. Although Johnson served until 2018, former Rep. Steve King (R-IA4) took up the mantle starting mid-decade, introducing versions in 2005, 2007, 2009, 2011, 2013, 2015, 2017, and 2019. None of those versions ever received a committee vote.

I'm guessing this latest version won't get a committee vote either.

15 posted on 12/21/2021 7:33:56 AM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EBH

Good start but he 17th amendment is terrible and needs to go also.


16 posted on 12/21/2021 7:34:43 AM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EBH

How stupid Americans were to change the Constitution to authorize government theft.


17 posted on 12/21/2021 7:37:21 AM PST by joma89 (Buy weapons and ammo, folks, and have the will to use them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bigbob

I agree....it depends on bureaucrat politicians who are paid from the very taxes this effort would seek to abolish.


18 posted on 12/21/2021 7:40:13 AM PST by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: EBH

Going nowhere.


19 posted on 12/21/2021 7:56:13 AM PST by ctdonath2 (Statistics don't matter when they happen to you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: butlerweave

“How about Term Limits for all the Critters”

Who do you include with “Critters”?

It would need to include staffers and so forth too, else you’d just end up with a lot of people who are the “power behind the throne” of elected officials as they change “bosses” from election to election.


20 posted on 12/21/2021 8:02:11 AM PST by KrisKrinkle (Blessed be those who know the depth and breadth of ignorance. Cursed be those who don't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson