Posted on 11/04/2021 3:53:53 AM PDT by Kaslin
Why did you get the shots?
And they tell us if we don’t get the latest booster, we’re as good as unvaccinated. So...
0 shots = (boosters - 1)
NOTHING he wrote shows such understanding. The #1 reason for not taking the jab is that there are FAR SAFER self-administered OTC treatments available.* He also fails to understand that calling the injection a “vaccine” is a deliberate lie to make people accept a potentially (deliberately?) disabling or deadly shot.
The guy’s ignorance means he should write his obituary in case it’s needed.
* There are many FR threads that give links to safe and effective prophylactic treatments and a few that tell what you can do to reduce adverse reactions if you’ve already been jabbed.
The only reasons to get the shots is (1) to keep your current job if you can't see a way to survive without it or (2) to be invited to parties with the "in crowd."
Since Emmett probably doesn't have to worry about going broke, his motive is probably the second reason.
Don't worry sir...you'll get PLENTY of chances to do it again. And again. And again. And...
I’m detecting quite a bit of sarcasm.
My response, as if anyone cares:
“Well, Emmett, at least there are some of us left who don’t obey every command, fear every microbe, bow to every bully, or believe every slogan. I understand that you are afraid of COVID. OK. Point made.
I’m not. So what? All you have done with your article is to make our jobs a little harder by fomenting doubt in the overworked, underpraised, over-lectured, and under-rewarded few who are still slogging along dutifully, supporting the rest of us (including you). ‘Way to go!’ Your contribution helped no one anywhere with anything. You probably should have just kept your mouth shut and commiserated alone, ‘sheltering in place’.
I will never regret refusing the jab, which I have had to do at least a thousand times because of nitwits like you, even if I die of COVID. Had I written such a piece as you have, I would call into the question the very purpose of my life and wonder whether I had done net harm or net good. I hope that it is not a pathetic postscript to all the good things you have written and said in the past. Good luck in finding the truth, should you decide to seek it. I don’t rate your chances very highly.”
Yep
0 for me too
Then they should have concluded the article with the approved tag: /s
;-) :-D
“They” who? THe author or the poster? I don’t think the author would feel the need (I could sense the sarcasm dripping ) and I don’t think it would be up to the poster to make that determination for the author.
A Pureblood is the appropriate term.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.