[SeekAndFind]

Yep, empower the IRS to become Big Brother and snoop on little guys' bank accounts on the premise that they might be billionaires cheating on their taxes. That quiet little deet could affect 100 million households, according to a report from Fox23.  It reminds me of the kind of logic that existed in Chile in the pre-Pinochet era.  Chileans, who now famously produce world-class wines, were actually forbidden in those days from planting new vineyards on the grounds that it could increase alcoholism.  Democrats, were they to hear of it, would take that particular idiocy as a how-to guide, so don't tell them.

Now the public know about their $600 snoop-and-spy scheme, and they're turning against it.  That's obvious enough as the Democrats scramble to modify the disgusting Trojan horse measure.

[struggle]

The only ones for it are those with less than $600 in their bank account

[RBW in PA]

Everyone needs withdraw half of their savings, send a message. The Banks will panic and send their lobbyists to have this removed. You need to make them hurt.

[albie]

“bombing with the public”

...AND? Our Marxist regime cares what the public thinks? When did this happen?

[unixfox]

So THIS is what it finally takes? Nevermind every thing else this rogue agency does.

See tagline.

[rktman]

If you don’t like it you’re unpatriotic like vaxx deniers.

[1Old Pro]

Now if only the feckless GOP could use this as part of their campaign to defeat the socialists. Oh, and they need to first begin with conservative candidates, not assistant Demorats.

[READINABLUESTATE]

Only 69%? Should be 100%.

[Lurkinanloomin]

Eliminating the carried interest loophole would generate more revenue, but that would affect the billionaires, so they won’t do it.

[HandBasketHell]

What difference does it make if it is “bombing” with the public?

[joethedrummer]

The American public ought to be able to monitor every GOVERNMENT spending transaction over $600.

Once again, they’ve flipped good/bad completely around.

[Nifster]

Too bad it’s not bombing with congress

[thirst4truth]

My renters pay $600 and $700 every month for rent. we have up to 20 deposits per month at that amount.
Is every single deposit I make every month into my rental account going to red flag the IRS?

[Little Ray]

Why should the Democrats care - it’s not like they have to worry about elections any more.

[Pearfect]

VOTE DEMOCRATS OUT !!!

They just wanna control everybody’s lives.

VOTE,THEM OUT !!!

[Pollard]

$600.00 is the W9/1099 limit. Coincidence?

[cuban leaf]

And I will add, I’d feel the same way if it was $60,000.

[BitWielder1]

I want every single congress critter and senator audited.
What are the chances of that happening?
But them keeping tabs on all of us is OK?

[qaz123]

69% are against this plan.

I’m betting that is the same percentage of the vote that President Trump actually got, before the cheating happened.

I’m betting that if 100 ACTUAL, REAL human beings, legally allowed to vote were sent into a voting precinct that would be the number of votes that President Trump would receive.

[cuban leaf]

And I will add, I’d feel the same way if it was $60,000.

Which hints at how I feel about $10,000 reporting and the concept of structuring.

And on a different but similar subject, it should never be a dollar amount. It should be based on a certain income level based on the current value of the dollar. Perhaps some multiple of the Federal minimum wage. Perhaps at the federal hourly minimum wage times 10,000.

But that would be seen by me only as a compromise on my part. They have no business looking into how much money we put in or take out of our bank accounts unless they already have probable cause to use a search warrant against our account.