Did The Fourth Branch of Government Release SARS-CoV-2 Then Blame China

theconservativetreehouse.com ^ | October 2, 2021 | Sundance

[Bobalu]

So much research has been done we essentially know the majority of the background details. The SARS-CoV-2 virus commonly known as COVID-19 was made in a lab by scientists. The virus then went from a lab to the global population in late 2019/early 2020. The epicenter of the outbreak appears to be one of the labs working on the virus in Wuhan, China. Those essential big picture items are no longer debated; although the Chinese government do not agree for obvious reasons.

[Bobalu]

Interesting

[DSH]

Interesting

Indeed. Although nothing new. SARS-COV-2 may have been released from the Wuhan virology lab, but the virus itself was designed by Americans, in America. This is well known. Guys like Rand Paul are just engaged in kabuki theatre, seeking whatever measure of short-term partisan advantage they might extract from the situation. But they have no interest in, or intention of, "getting to the bottom" of things. They already know not to go there.

People may not want to believe this, preferring to lay the blame solely on the CCP, but it is true nevertheless.

[Rurudyne]

So Dr Faulty, who years ago said that it was worth the risk of a pandemic to do gain of function research, also was the guy illegally restoring funding to the Wuhan lab, predicting that Trump would face a surprise pandemic, is also probably benefitting financially because of this clot shot related patents, and is part of the group doing everything they can to not only have everyone get multiple jabs but also suppress use of other treatments.

But, you know, coincidences happen….

[Olog-hai]

You saying there’s a difference between the US left and the Red Chinese left?

Those people do not think in terms of countries.

Red China is as much to blame as US leftists, as well as leftists around the whole planet.

[PGR88]

One could argue that the US deep state and the CCP both would benefit from a planned pandemic.

[Jeff Chandler]

From the comments:

jmbuck
October 3, 2021 12:28 am
Just one question. Was this the insurance policy? or at least part of it?

[JustaTech]

The “PAYload” of the virus is the vaccine, and eventually making a majority of the people psychologically addicted to vaccines and boosters. China is the perfect patsy for this business plan.

[stockpirate]

Everyone needs to read this article and the connecting article,

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2021/08/08/the-fourth-branch-of-united-states-government/

This is a really bad situation we are in, really bad.

[NTHockey]

This virus should be referred to as the Fauci flu. He owns it.

[iontheball]

I and George Webb have strongly entertained the theory that the the Chinese were set up by DARPA/DOD/FDA, etc., as patsies in this grand experiment. What can you make of intelligent individuals paying for and giving a deadly weapon to someone who you know is incapable of handling the weapon safely. It’s a perfect cover for a diabolically evil mission.

[ronnie raygun]

Interesting read, the cancer runs deep

[Uncle Miltie]

Is this conjecture, or is there any evidence?

[BobL]

“The Defense Department would not be spending money to develop a biological weapon in Wuhan, China unless they already had developed that weapon in the United States. The Pentagon would not give a biological weapon to the communist Chinese unless the U.S. already developed it; and unless they already had a countermeasure to the consequences of it.”

Starts making sense, when one considers that the people on Ivermectin (the DC Democrats) seem to NEVER get sick from the virus (with a few rare exceptions, as even Ivermectin isn’t 100% perfect). And also the over-the-top reaction to others using Ivermectin, along with the news blackout from India on Ivermectin.

But eventually, the truth does leak out, and so they had the drug companies come up with treatments based on Ivermectin, but under different names (for obvious reasons) to put an end to the virus, once and for all.

[Pollard]

Back when I was on twitter, there was a guy running for senator that did a twitter thread on this. Said it was made in a .mil lab, made it’s way to Canada and then onto china.

[Pollard]

and knowing what we do now about our generals ...

[ridesthemiles]

Fauci has never been a practicing doctor.

He always did “research”.

BILL GATES funded his research for many years.

Gates strongly believes in a MUCH LOWER POPULATION ON EARTH.

Connect the dots.

[John W]

Read both. Notice the solution presented has already been figured out by the powers that be and commenting at public meetings is being curtailed including armed guards. I’m afraid we’re doomed.

[stockpirate]

Written above an entrance to the DOJ. “ REPRESSION BREEDS VIOLENCE”

Nothing can stop what is coming, nothing

[Bratch]

Did The Fourth Branch of Government Release SARS-CoV-2 Then Blame China

October 2, 2021 | Sundance | 461 Comments

So much research has been done, we essentially know the majority of the background details.  The SARS-CoV-2 virus commonly known as COVID-19 was made in a lab by scientists.  The virus then went from a lab to the global population in late 2019/early 2020.  The epicenter of the outbreak appears to be one of the labs working on the virus in Wuhan, China.  Those essential big picture items are no longer debated; although the Chinese government does not agree for obvious reasons.

With the ‘where’, ‘when’ and ‘how’ essentially agreed, the question of ‘who’ and ‘why’ remains.

The Chinese have blamed the U.S. Intelligence agencies for releasing the virus.  The U.S. Intelligence agencies have said they don’t know who released it or from where. [LINK] The U.S. Intelligence position is weird and obtuse, then again, the Intelligence Community specializes in being weird and obtuse.

The cornerstone of the CTH hypothesis, regarding the ‘who’ and ‘why’ of the COVID-19 virus, is built upon the intelligence communitie’s odd position and one very key circumstantial point that stands out loudly.   The U.S. Pentagon was funding the creation of SARS as a biological weapon in Wuhan, China, under the auspices of national security.

“Grants from the Pentagon included $6,491,025 from the Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA) from 2017 to 2020” (link).

♦ Central Point – The Defense Department would not be spending money to develop a biological weapon in Wuhan, China unless they already had developed that weapon in the United States.   The Pentagon would not give a biological weapon to the communist Chinese unless the U.S. already developed it; and unless they already had a countermeasure to the consequences of it.

In the original pdf guidance for the 2014 research pause of into weaponization of SARS viruses there was an important footnote [LINK]:

[FN¹  SOURCE – U.S. Government Gain-of-Function Deliberative Process and Research Funding Pause

on Selected Gain-of-Function Research Involving Influenza, MERS, and SARS Viruses – pdf, page 2 – October 17, 2014]

Timeline:

♦ October 17, 2014 – U.S. funding of SARS to create a biological weapon was paused due to the extreme risk of a pandemic.  However, the pause allowed agencies within the U.S. government to continue funding if they determined “the research is urgently necessary to protect the public health or national security.” [LINK]

♦ 2014 through 2020 the Pentagon continued funding research in Wuhan, China. Fear of discovery would explain why many top officials in the U.S. Defense Department were against the Trump administration [with increased severity after the COVID pandemic began]. [LINK]

♦ May 2016 – [An Election Year] – “after thorough deliberation and extensive input from domestic and international stakeholders, the NSABB [National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity] issued its recommendations. NSABB’s central finding was that studies that are expected to enhance Potential Pandemic Pathogen (PPP) have potential benefits to public health but also entail significant risks. NSABB recommended that such studies warranted additional scrutiny prior to being funded.”  Anthony Fauci is on the NSABB.

♦ January 9, 2017 – [Four Days after the Susan Rice Oval Office meeting with Obama, Biden, Comey, et al] – The Obama Administration re-authorizes funding for the creation of SARS biological weapons.  “Adoption of these recommendations will satisfy the requirements for lifting the current moratorium on certain life sciences research that could enhance a pathogen’s virulence and/or transmissibility to produce a potential pandemic pathogen (an enhanced PPP).“ [LINK]

Given the workarounds, exceptions and plausible deniability for the consequences, built into the original moratorium guidance in 2014, the defense department was operationally permitted to keep funding the biological weapons research in Wuhan, China.  The 2014 ban was a funding moratorium in name only; however, it appears the funding for U.S. research in North Carolina was stopped.

What was reauthorized in 2017, just before President Trump took office, was the need to use “national security” as an excuse to continue the research.  It also appears funding of SARS as a biological weapon inside the U.S. (North Carolina) was now permitted again.

REFERENCES SO FAR: 

• 2017 – Policy Guidelines from Obama Administration 
• 2014 – pdf link of Research Funding Pause – National Science Advisory Board (Wiki)
• Pentagon Funding for SARS research 2013 through 2020.

If you accept that the Pentagon would never spend to develop a biological weapon in China (Wuhan Lab) unless they already had developed that weapon on their own (North Carolina Lab), then the question about the release of that weapon starts to take shape.

Remember, the State Department was looking into the origin until Joe Biden shut them down and redirected the goal to the Intelligence Community.  In essence, Biden handed the mission to the Fourth Branch of Government.   Not surprisingly, after a few months the IC said their results were “inconclusive.”

• [Excerpt] – […] In one State Department meeting, officials seeking to demand transparency from the Chinese government say they were explicitly told by colleagues not to explore the Wuhan Institute of Virology’s gain-of-function research, because it would bring unwelcome attention to U.S. government funding of it.

In an internal memo obtained by Vanity Fair, Thomas DiNanno, former acting assistant secretary of the State Department’s Bureau of Arms Control, Verification, and Compliance, wrote that staff from two bureaus, his own and the Bureau of International Security and Nonproliferation, “warned” leaders within his bureau “not to pursue an investigation into the origin of COVID-19” because it would “‘open a can of worms’ if it continued.”

[…] In late March, former Centers for Disease Control director Robert Redfield received death threats from fellow scientists after telling CNN that he believed COVID-19 had originated in a lab. “I was threatened and ostracized because I proposed another hypothesis,” Redfield told Vanity Fair. “I expected it from politicians. I didn’t expect it from science.” (read more)

• Washington (CNN) – “President Joe Biden’s team shut down a closely-held State Department effort launched late in the Trump administration to prove the coronavirus originated in a Chinese lab over concerns about the quality of its work, according to three sources familiar with the decision.

The existence of the State Department inquiry and its termination this spring by the Biden administration — neither of which has been previously reported — comes to light amid renewed interest in whether the virus could have leaked out of a Wuhan lab with links to the Chinese military. The Biden administration is also facing scrutiny of its own efforts to determine if the Chinese government was responsible for the virus.

• “On Wednesday, Biden issued a statement that he has directed the US intelligence community to redouble its efforts in investigating the origins of the Covid-19 pandemic and report back to him in 90 days.” (LINK)

• [WASHINGTON DC] – The intelligence community failed to conclusively identify the origin of the coronavirus following a 90-day investigation ordered by President Biden, but experts are divided on why. 

A report by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) found that officials were unable to rule whether the virus escaped from a lab or spread to humans through an infected animal.  But the ultimate conclusion reached by the $85 billion-a-year community was that it would be unable to pinpoint the origin of the virus if China didn’t fully cooperate.  (LINK)

If you have followed how the U.S. Intelligence Community operates, you can see a pretty clear picture emerge of a strong likelihood surrounding what took place.

• The U.S. Defense Dept developed SARS-CoV-2 in North Carolina. 
• The 4th Branch (Intelligence Community) wanted to use it. 
• The Pentagon restarts funding for development of SARS-CoV-2 in partnership with Wuhan, China – setting up the cover story. 
• The 4th Branch (Intelligence Community) then uses the virus by releasing it in/around Wuhan. 

Everything after that is simply part of the 4th Branch covering their tracks.  Wuhan, China becomes the patsy.

The IC release of COVID-19 would have two transparent motives for the 4th Branch: 

(1) Get rid of Trump via mail-in ballots, and intelligence assistance toward the 2020 election result; and

(2) Expand their influence and control operations as the most powerful force in U.S. government.

One of the central players, who likely knows the details behind who exactly executed the release, is former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, who has been blaming the Chinese almost exclusively.

[Methinks he doth protest too much.]

Former DNI John Ratcliffe is also a staunch figure pointing at Wuhan, China.  Keep in mind DNI Ratcliffe was the recipient of the 4th Branch Intelligence Community products that pointed to Wuhan, China.

If it sounds like this thesis is too far ‘out there‘, then you may not fully understand how the Fourth Branch of Government operates.

[reformedliberal]

The “PAYload” of the virus is the vaccine, and eventually making a majority of the people psychologically addicted to vaccines and boosters. China is the perfect patsy for this business plan.
______________________________
If only it was as simple as “psychological addiction”.

In reality, it is an extortion scheme that first destroys your biological immune system, enforces a coercive mandate regime that allows disease carriers to enter the country, come in contact with people who are generating variants with lessened symptoms to the carrier, then leveraging the resultant epidemics into a force multiplier to coerce more injections of toxic elements into the already immno-compromised carriers, who will create more variants.

Variant-production that you must pay the pharma companies to alleviate with more disease-causing injections. Immune systems as a service.

Everyone who is inoculated and who has also been fortunate enough to avoid any reaction will be forced eventually to receive regular injections of disease-causing products until they, too, manifest adverse reactions.

What a deal.

I’m sure the victims assuring everyone they are just fine will line up obediently while telling us the unvaxxed are causing the spread of “statistically negligible” reactions because they are being conned by established scientists with Nobel Prizes, numerous patents and peer-reviewed publications from the distant time when science wasn’t influenced by ideology.

I suppose, in the end game, anyone who survives this regimen without, at the east, *minor* neurological and organ malfunctions, will be simply excluded from the remnants of society and encouraged to die alone, ignored.

OK. I have no problem with secession from this insanity and I have accepted the inevitability of death for everyone. Have all the cheerleaders done likewise?

Will China obediently accept the blame? Or are the same maniacs behind the vaxx scheme cleverly engineering a nuclear war?

I think they want to let it all burn rather than ever be held to account.