Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BenLurkin

So far it’s a lawful order. Burden of the service member to prove it’s not (flips the burden of proof because all orders are presumed lawful under UCMJ Article 92, so that would be an affirmative defense). That said, unless some commander really wants to make a point, he/she is not going to push for a general court martial and dishonorable discharge for refusing the shot. Even if convicted and given a DD, likely would not be upheld on appeal minus significant aggravating factors.

Colonel, USAF TJAGCR (ret)


12 posted on 09/09/2021 1:05:17 PM PDT by jagusafr ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: jagusafr; napscoordinator

Thank you.


13 posted on 09/09/2021 1:07:50 PM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion, or satire. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: jagusafr

Thx Colonel. To the point and enlightening.


27 posted on 09/09/2021 5:27:20 PM PDT by ex91B10 (Just because you can doesn't mean you should. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson