Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Former FBI Agent Says 9-11 Hijackers had U.S.-based support
NY Post ^ | 09/04/2021 | Dana Kennedy

Posted on 09/07/2021 8:13:50 AM PDT by Kid Shelleen

At least two of the 9-11 hijackers probably had a U.S.-based support network, according to a former FBI agent.

Danny Gonzalez worked on “Operation Encore,” the still-secret investigation into the two Saudi hijackers who were based in San Diego. Gonzalez told CBS News he’s confident the records of that operation will show the hijackers had help.

“19 hijackers cannot commit 3,000 mass murders by themselves,” Gonzalez told the network.

(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 20010911; 911; 911hijackers; alhamzi; almidhar; almostas; encore; fallschurch; fallschurchcell; hikmatshakir; kualalumpur; malaysia; opened; operationencore; sandiego; sandiegocell; sdcell; shakir; terrorsummit
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-152 last
To: GregNH

anything that has jessie ventura involved is pure lunacy...


141 posted on 09/09/2021 7:58:32 AM PDT by basalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: GregNH

Amusing thing I saw on one of my rare TV watching spasms:

A show on Nikola Tesla.

Segment on his ‘earthquake machine’ a thumper that periodically excited a structure at its resonant frequency.
The claim was that when Tesla tried it, the entire building he mounted in on started to shake and he wisely stopped, the declared he could bring down NYC with a similar unit.

Cut to a commercial showing one of the WTC towers disintegrating...


142 posted on 09/09/2021 8:34:24 AM PDT by null and void (No jab/no job=only the compliant can work, they won't spread dangerous ideas around the workplace!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: basalt
He is not involved. Only his comment because it happens to be relevant. But you are welcome to shot the messenger anyway.
143 posted on 09/09/2021 12:27:23 PM PDT by GregNH (If you can't fight, please find a good place to hide! )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: GregNH
Agreed, I watched the towers turn into dust, was astonished at the 'melted cars'

Anyone who takes the time to study the work of Judy Wood will never be able to accept the official version.

144 posted on 09/09/2021 3:33:07 PM PDT by Fred Nerks (fair dinkum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: GregNH
My problem with these kinds of presentations is that they do not offer a clear thesis with an organized body of evidence and argument in support of it. Instead, the authors profess credentials and expertise and deliver a mass of material and insist that it proves something or other amounting to nothing more than seemingly ominous questions and suspicions.

You may be a retired engineer, but I am a retired lawyer with a late in life career shift to professional political research. I know BS and BS artists all too well. For many years, my living depended on detecting lies and ferreting out and proving the truth.

Lack of clarity is a sign that someone is running a con or is a fool. On provocative and troubling subjects, both abound.

When reinforced concrete fails under overwhelming stress, it breaks up into dust, concrete fragments, and twisted rebar. Aside from the size of the WTC and the horror of the 9/11 attack, no one has shown me anything in the failure of the WTC that contradicts physics, engineering, and common sense.

145 posted on 09/10/2021 6:52:30 AM PDT by Rockingham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: Rockingham
One would think that a lawyer would look at the "evidence" before coming to a conclusion.
146 posted on 09/10/2021 11:29:51 AM PDT by GregNH (If you can't fight, please find a good place to hide! )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: GregNH

I did look at the supposed evidence. But what is it supposed to prove? And who do I sue for wasting my time?


147 posted on 09/10/2021 1:09:19 PM PDT by Rockingham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: Rockingham
So you didn't see steel beams turn to dust before your eyes? You didn't see twisted steel beams with no stress related breaks, cracks, heat trails, or other signs? You didn't see almost perfect round hole in glass? You didn't see burnt portions of cars where there is no signs heat damage right next to what appears to be burnt metal? What happened to the engines of these cars that simply disappeared? I could on and on.

I think you are being disingenuous. Go to another thread and stop wasting your time here.

148 posted on 09/10/2021 3:37:45 PM PDT by GregNH (If you can't fight, please find a good place to hide! )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: GregNH

What proposition is being contended for? IF there is none, then all the supposed evidence is immaterial as it does not engage on an issue.


149 posted on 09/10/2021 3:56:49 PM PDT by Rockingham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: Rockingham
Simply what happened to the buildings. It is clear that a direct energy technology was used. Judy clearly demonstrates that with the evidence.
150 posted on 09/10/2021 4:06:08 PM PDT by GregNH (If you can't fight, please find a good place to hide! )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: GregNH

What exactly is meant by “directed energy technology”? That Ming the Merciless zapped the buildings with a secret power beam? Or something more real world? If so, how was such a weapon put in place and used so precisely in a city thick with tall buildings? And is there any evidence that such a weapon exists?


151 posted on 09/10/2021 5:26:52 PM PDT by Rockingham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: GregNH

YouTube posted a link to the official 9/11 story that you can use to contrast with the evidence highlighted in this video, then decide for yourself if their story addressed the issue using the scientific method. Why couldn’t the National Geographic (or BBC) experts melt steel with thermite?
NOTE: THERMATE = Thermite + SULFUR
(The FEMA report could not explain the source of the SULFUR ) Learn more: www.911speakout.org

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5d5iIoCiI8g


152 posted on 09/10/2021 6:34:39 PM PDT by Fred Nerks (fair dinkum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-152 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson