THIS IS MURDER, STERILIZATION, and GENOCIDE by the CDC for PROFIT
from their "vaccine"-DNAoperating system.
Posted on 08/11/2021 9:58:17 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
click-bait
They are lying.
Reads like Twitter. “Mssks and vaccines are safe and effective according to experts, journalists, and fact checkers.”
Women took Thalidomide for morning sickness ...
cousin in Vancouver BC just told us her girlfriend lost her baby soon after the vax
THIS IS MURDER, STERILIZATION, and GENOCIDE by the CDC for PROFIT
from their "vaccine"-DNAoperating system.
Is this the infamous study which had a large percentage of respondents lost-to-followup?
https://presscalifornia.com/2021/05/06/ben-shapiros-sister-got-the-jab-and-a-donut-then-a-miscarriage/
“The analysis found miscarriage rates post-vaccination were approximately 13 percent.”
Let that sink in
That’s not a particularly alarming number.
https://www.healthgrades.com/right-care/pregnancy/how-common-is-miscarriage
If the CDC told us the sky was blue, I would have to set up a spectrometer in the pasture and measure the wavelength of the light. I don’t believe ANYTHING THEY SAY. They are just a bunch of propagandists.
We all know how Democrats feel about unborn children…
And people in the original trials were 100% protected from hospitalizations and death. How’d that pan out?
Where’s that joke about the person who jumps from thirty stories up and reports everything just fine as he passes the tenth floor.
= = =
So if he reports fine at every floor, there will be a one out of 30 failure rate.
That is very low.
Everybody jump.
I’ve been trying to find birth info online to see whether it’s going up or down. There doesn’t seem to be a lot of it out there, and it’s not very current. If anyone knows of a source, I’d appreciate it.
you won’t see an impact until 9+ months after the majority of women started to get jabbed. Assume that was around May 2021... add 9 months... and you may start to see the birth rates dropping in March 2022. of course, the pattern wouldn’t be discernible for 6-12 months after that
meanwhile, you may find this useful:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8117969/
in particular, table 4 citation 2. try to discern how many were jabbed in the first 2 trimesters (127) and how many of those miscarried (104).
crazy high percentage
I could see the impact showing up in September, ramping up for four or five months after that, before leveling off. Might be hard to identify with all the other noise - couples staying home, singles not socializing, depressed economics.
Thanks for the link. Their conclusion was “did not show obvious safety signals”. Interesting that they suggest follow-up is necessary. Considering this was done in April based on February 28th data, how hard would it have been to update the study based on April or May data, could have been ready by now. Suspicious that the CDC saying safe for pregnant women to vaccinate now, although perhaps they have more up to date info.
Note they use “pregnant persons” in the title.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.