[blueplum]

you know, we need a concerted effort where gay business owners are contacted and demand is made for a religious painting or cake or whatever. Then sue when they decline. Two can play this game, and so far, only one side is playing while the other thinks they're sitting ducks.

[daniel1212]

"you know, we need a concerted effort where gay business owners are contacted and demand is made for a religious painting or cake or whatever. Then sue when they decline. Two can play this game, and so far, only one side is playing while the other thinks they're sitting ducks."

The courts do not play that way, for unlike being born again and thus having a orientation toward Godliness, homosexuality is treated as racial or ethnicity, and thus while they can refuse to be complicit in the creation of a work for the expressed purpose of celebrating something related to Biblical morality, Christians cannot refuse to be complicit in the creation of a work for the expressed purpose of celebrating something contrary to the law of God, even if it is illegal, as was in the Masterpiece case. For the work is related to what the customers were, and thus is treated as if it were a refusal to create a cake for an interracial marriage. That is what happens when Biblical morality is rejected.