Posted on 06/29/2021 3:38:54 PM PDT by Roman_War_Criminal
Not to my knowledge.
I think it will be something quite similar to that IMHO
Or $19.98 (cough)
Exactly
Spot on there
just another form of virtue signaling
I’ve noticed that a lot of the comments from historical-political perspectives lament the loss of liberty and loss of the respect for individual decision-making.
As in, what happened to the spirit of the Founders? What’s with all the groupthink? And not being satisfied with everyone making his own choice whichever way, many are at the ready to shame and punish non-comformists.
Ergo, heirs to freedom sold their birthright for fear of dying of COVID-19.
Kind of like,
Genesis 25:32 And Esau said, Behold, I am at the point to die: and what profit shall this birthright do to me?
In a weird twist, a lot of us are old enough to remember this saying:
“Better dead than red.”
Which was the Cold War era expression for,
“Give me liberty or give me death.”
These jabs really *are* like bells, because you can’t unring a bell.
Strange stuff going on out there.
My point is hospitals etc. are not supposed to give out that info and I have a right to privacy (iffy these days) What gives a company the authority to ask me about my health status? I am all for private companies doing business their way but that sure didn’t work for Lester Maddox’s chicken restaurant in the 60’s and I doubt a question about do you now or have you ever had aids would fly. COVID is an excuse for moving towards 1984 and too many corporations seem happy wid dat.
Kickass Conservative wrote:
“Check the WISH APP. It will be available next week for $1.99 plus shipping from China.”
What is this WISH app?
An WISH APP has discount items from China (where else?). There is a website too.
Some pretty good deals, some junk and a lot of “interesting” items, you never know.
What -do- the links say, what percentage ?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I have no idea… that number isn’t contained in the links. My issue is what Amendment10 said in post 65 which was…. “It’s being claimed that sixty percent of people that get vaccinated are still getting the virus.” What Dr. Risch said at the link is “They’ve estimated 60 percent of new patients they’ve been treating have been people who’ve been vaccinated.” These two statements are nowhere close to meaning the same thing…. not only in numbers but to what is being referred to. For starters, ‘still getting the virus’ is not the same as ‘being treated after being vaccinated’.
Thanks for this information; 60% of the new patients have had their shots means the shots didn’t work so well for them.
What we don’t know is how many of those 60% get a bad enough case of it to have to go in hospital.
The first statement of “60% of people that get vaccinated are still getting the virus” means that if you took 1,000 random people that are vaccinated, 600 of them are still getting the virus.” That statement is clear but it isn’t based on anything and is false.
The statement “They’ve estimated 60 percent of new patients they’ve been treating have been people who’ve been vaccinated” is not quite so simple and needs to be qualified. Let me give an example and for starters, we don’t know anything about the pool that the 1,000 new people who need to be treated are coming from. Is that pool from 1,000, 10,000, 100,000 or 1,000,000 people? Next, we assume that the treatment is for covid related reasons but the statement doesn’t exactly say that…..it just says that they are ‘new’ patients which intones that they have some covid related reason for seeking treatment and are people who have never had a previous reason to have that type of treatment previously. The next problem is that of the pool of people from whom the 1,000 people are drawn, there is no information here as to how many of these people are vaccinated and how many are not. As you can quickly, see, if the pool is made up only 10% people, who are vaccinated that yields wildly different results than if the pool is made up of people who are 90% vaccinated. If the pool is made up of people of which 60% are vaccinated, and 60% of the new people who need treatment are vaccinated, I think this means that whether one is vaccinated or not makes zero difference. Then there is the whole problem of what does ‘new treatment’ mean……….
Didn’t start off to make that explanation that long… it’s just that every time one tries to explain something, there is another angle to it that exposes another problem.
If you think an entrepreneur profiting off of the idiocy of liberals is a problem, then I would say you are in the wrong country.
How original, n00b.
Not.
Are you in the USA? You didn’t say.
I obviously lack your originality. I mean, you just replaced some letters with numbers that look like those letters - I have never seen such a thing before.
I am from the USA. A natural born citizen.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.