Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

No one is looking forward to the toxic ‘booster’ so they are now fanning the flames of panic - ready to once drive the herd into the chute for mass vaccination.

Researchers located people who had SARS1 in 2003 and tested them in 2021 with SARS1 again to see if they were still immune. They were. Their immunity had endured well for 17 years and is still going strong.

They tested that same group with Covid (Sars2) and they were fully immune because SARS1 (2003) and Sars2 (2019) only differ in their genome by 22%

Now, the variants are only 1 or 2% different from Covid. If you had Covid, or another similar Coronavirus, you have immunity.

The claims for variants are reinventions which do not adhere to traditional understanding of immunity (THEY ARE FRAUDS) and reveal their intentions - new lockdowns and ‘vaccines’.


6 posted on 06/17/2021 9:15:18 AM PDT by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ransomnote
On January 10 2020 a consortium led by Yong-Zhen Zhang of the Shanghai Public Health Clinical Center & School of Public Health posted the genome sequence on an open-access site, virological.org.

Mrna technology was already existent and Moderna began work almost immediately. Once the Genome had been supplied it was relatively easy to fabricate a vaccine so long as you weren't to careful to look closely at it ie: Warp Speed

https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/01/chinese-researchers-reveal-draft-genome-virus-implicated-wuhan-pneumonia-outbreak

This was same folks (China) who were still lying regarding the source of Covid namely the “wet market. Their data was accepted virtually without question. I can find no where Kochs’ postulate or Bradford Hill criteria were used to prove that what the Chinese supplied was correct.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Koch%27s_postulates

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bradford_Hill_criteria

A funny thing happened on the way to the vaccines

https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.04.15.440089v4
“Distinct SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Responses Elicited by Natural Infection and mRNA Vaccination”

Then there is this
http://market-ticker.org/cgi-ticker/akcs-www?post=242430

and where he sourced it from as its now peer reviewed.

https://www.cell.com/cell/pdf/S0092-8674(21)00706-6.pdf?_returnURL=https%3A%2F%2Flinkinghub.elsevier.com%2Fretrieve%2Fpii%2FS0092867421007066%3Fshowall%3Dtrue Bottom line the vaccines work sort of but have to develop high AB levels as the majority of the AB are non-neutralizing. This is not good. As AB levels drop over time a booster is required as the vaccine does not confer immunity like a natural infection. Lather rinse repeat.

16 posted on 06/17/2021 10:52:04 AM PDT by Polynikes ( Hakkaa paalle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson