Well you have posted from NPR, so here is the story link from an outlet you have used.
That is the raw data that got Tucker in trouble. Anyone (including hypochondriacs and anti-vaxxers) can post raw data, though there are legal penalties if bad intent can be proved in posting something that tuens out to be false
It is amazing to me how the most rabid of antivaxxers will now defend Kennedy et al. Tenpenny is a first class quack, and the rest of the list of which 65% of the anti vaccination information that is incorrect seems from, are about the same.
But, its going to continue to be interesting to see those who are so inclined to defend this dirty dozen as it is in alignment with their beliefs.