I’ve heard of LifeSiteNews, but that’s about it.
My point is that the MSM sources are no better than the sites like LifeSiteNews.
People believe the sources that they want to believe, it seems. But over time, info can be verified.
A simple example: I followed the Zimmerman case almost from day one on Conservative Treehouse (CT). I fully expected the verdict we got, based on the information I received from CT before the trial. People who got their news from the MSM were shocked. There is a reason for that.
cuban leaf wrote: “People believe the sources that they want to believe, it seems. But over time, info can be verified.”
Couldn’t agree more, that’s why I used the tag line: “Most pick the expert who says the things they agree with.” Funny thing is the number of people who’ve attacked me for saying that, they ‘follow the science’.