1 posted on
03/23/2021 10:27:53 PM PDT by
blueplum
To: blueplum; timestax
[Mehta said, adding, “this case will not be tried in the media.”]
But the false narrative has already been reinforced in the minds of the stupid sheeple addicted to “the news” - as intended.
2 posted on
03/23/2021 10:38:49 PM PDT by
SaveFerris
(Luke 17:28 ... as it was in the days of Lot; they did eat, they drank, they bought, they sold ......)
To: blueplum
All these statements of concern from judges are meaningless until they sanction or arrest some prosecutor for contempt of court, or dismiss cases.
The DOJ couldn’t give a flying fornication about the judge “expressing concern”.
3 posted on
03/23/2021 10:39:18 PM PDT by
DesertRhino
(Dog is man's best friend, and moslems hate dogs. Add that up. .... )
6 posted on
03/23/2021 11:12:50 PM PDT by
Gene Eric
(Don't be a statist!)
To: blueplum
7 posted on
03/24/2021 12:59:53 AM PDT by
GOP Poet
(Super cool you can change your tag line EVERYTIME you post!! :D. (Small things make me happy))
To: blueplum
The Judge should have Sanctioned the Prosecutor and referred him to the BAR for Disciplinary review.
And this is whats wrong with our legal system, Government Employee’s allowing other Government Employee’s to be DISHONEST and CORRUPT
8 posted on
03/24/2021 6:28:08 AM PDT by
eyeamok
(founded in cynicism, wrapped in sarcasm)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson