Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: lightman
Committee members were given the choice of voting for a statement proposed by Chairman Lawrence Tabas that “strongly rebukes but does not censure” Toomey, and a second statement that does censure him.

The censure movement was blocked by a narrow 128-124 margin, with 13 abstentions, according to a source who had been briefed on the results.

So they voted to "rebuke" but not to"censure"?

Is there really a difference? Aren't they both just verbal criticisms?

8 posted on 03/01/2021 9:10:36 PM PST by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: FreeReign
Is there really a difference? Aren't they both just verbal criticisms?

Toothless tigers by any other name...

10 posted on 03/01/2021 9:13:31 PM PST by lightman (I am a binary Trinitarian. Deal with it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: FreeReign
"So they voted to "rebuke" but not to"censure"?"

They could have expressed their displeasure, reprimanded him, issued a reproach, admonished him, chastised him, or rebuked him. But I would have liked to see them thoroughly castigate him.

18 posted on 03/02/2021 12:11:41 AM PST by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: FreeReign

Hé was also admonished.


20 posted on 03/02/2021 2:30:23 AM PST by Lisbon1940 (No full-term Governors (at the time of election))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson