Posted on 02/05/2021 6:07:22 AM PST by Eleutheria5
I hope you’re right.
Even if they find a judge like that, there are three levels of appeal.
Bring it.
That works both ways.
Tell it to the judge after discovery is completed.
Yes...
Not a lawyer, but I did represent myself in Pro Per against a man who had high flying lawyers. I sued for return of my money paid for a property that was fraudulently represented.
First trial, District court, I won. The seller of the property appealed to the Nevada Supreme Court.
The Appeal at the Nevada Supreme Court, I won again.
Not only did I have the facts of the case, I had the evidence of the case. The evidence was insurmountable.
Discovery was the tool that brought out all the evidence.
My trials were in 2003 and 2004. I still get a chuckle how a simple, mom of two and teacher overcame and won against wealthy, sleazy, and deceitful lawyers and businessmen.
If we can only have a court hear the evidence, we will win.
One those appeals will cost money two the entire just us system is corrupt.
If they didn't have proof then they sure as hell do now.
As it's titled... "ABSOLUTE PROOF"
Both of these links take you to the SAME video.
Corruption has been with us for a long time. But usually you can get redress somewhere in the appellate courts. I do believe there will be some serious backlash from 75,000,000 voters if nobody can have their day in court. Brave Sir Roberts was afraid of street riots. He might be even more afraid of what those 75M concerned citizens will do if they get seriously p!ssed, and if his yellow streak wins him over, he will rule that, yes, a civil defendant gets discovery.
IF you can afford it.
I can’t afford it. Trump can. So can Fox. If he were a super hero, he’d be called Money Man, and also Orange Man.
Do you think discovery is going to show that the Smartmatic software was used outside of Los Angeles County, CA?
I understand your frustration. I do.
These lawsuits are farcical. The statements made were based on affidavits. If this stands, no lawyer could publicly present their client’s side of a case without being sued into oblivion.
The very fact that they are claiming 2.7 billion in damages means that it WAS. Ad damnum clauses are often inflated, but they’re going to have to provide a bill of particulars, itemizing the alleged damages, and to scrape together that much harm, they had to have major economic interests, way beyond LA County.
“The very fact that they are claiming 2.7 billion in damages means that it WAS.”
I don’t see how that follows.
The damages don’t have anything to do with where their software was used in 2020. According to the complaint, the damages are about harm to reputation and therefore loss of future revenues (and they add in some other stuff like getting threatened, yadda yadda yadda.)
Look, like I said, I fully understand your frustration. I’m also saying I’ve read the complaint. (Well, I read the meat of the complaint.) It does not seem to me that it would be difficult for anyone to verify where their software was used. Just that ALONE makes this troublesome.
The damages don’t have anything to do with where their software was used in 2020. According to the complaint, the damages are about harm to reputation and therefore loss of future revenues
Defendant broke my hand, and now I will never become a concert violinist, or even apply to Juliard’s instrumental program. Future revenues have to be based on more than “we got us a gig in LA”.
Let’s see a business plan certified by a CPA, and actual revenue before and after the Trump Team started calling them mean things.
My office once represented a false arrest plaintiff, who claimed being taken away in cuffs ruined his reputation, except he had no reputation, other than a bad one.
Have you read the complaint?
Smartmatic does lay out its damages.
But I still don’t follow how the amount of damages they are asking for PROVES that they were in more than one state.
Haven’t read the complaint. I just note that they can’t claim to be just a mom and pop operation on one hand, and on the other that they lost 2.7 billion. Either they are a big player, which I believe they are, or they are a mom and pop voting machine software company with no major role in the 2020 election, just your friendly neighborhood software company, which is absurd.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.