“Oh there’s not one bit of evidence.”
Except several state legislatures let their courts and not legislative officials change the election laws.
And bobble head Roberts wouldnt hear the cases.
I've been saying that since November 4th, plus when the USSC threw out the Texas (and some 15 supporting States) lawsuit due to "no standing". How can the millions of voters have no standing when the evidence of the steal was obvious? I still can't understand why the USSC didn't even look at the merits of the case.
Was it because the AG of Texas filed the suit and not one of the candidates? If so, still didn't hold water just to be ignored. Millions of voters were disenfranchised due to the fraud in certain counties. It's a proven fact.
The USSC voted in favor of Bush vs Gore when Florida tried to change their Electors without Legislative due process. I just don't get why the USSC didn't look at the merits of the Texas suit. Half of the Country's votes were eliminated due to the steal.