Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Peter Navarro's Report Vol. 3 is Online At The Link Below Proving Election Vote Fraud...Biden Lost!!
Peter Navarro ^ | recently | Peter Navarro

Posted on 01/25/2021 1:00:04 PM PST by Stayfree

In light of this evidence, it is also irresponsible – in the extreme–for the Democrat Party and its leadership, or journalists in the mainstream media, or RINO Republicans to claim there is no evidence of election irregularities. That’s absurd on its face. As this report shows, there is an abundance of evidence – a virtual cornucopia of potentially poisonous election irregularities.

(Excerpt) Read more at img1.wsimg.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bidenlost; bloggers; electionfraud; fraud; invalidatedstate; navarroreport; part3; trump; voterfraud; won
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 last
To: Stayfree

BFLR


41 posted on 01/25/2021 3:14:37 PM PST by musicman (The future is just a collection of successive nows.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: musicman
Spread the word so more of the American people know about this...phuck the courts...we need to get all of the American people with us to get rid of the Democrat crooks!!!!!!!!

YEAH TRUMP!!


42 posted on 01/25/2021 3:54:44 PM PST by Stayfree (ElectionVoteFraud.com is coming!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Mmogamer

I agree with your post.

The focus should be on how to address this voting by mail issue to help give confidence to the next vote.


43 posted on 01/25/2021 3:57:22 PM PST by hawkaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Stayfree

There most certainly is evidence of voter irregularities, voter fraud. No one can deny that. It’s nothing new however. To any who breathlessly claim it about 2020’s election, I’d ask, in the words of John McClain, “welcome to the party pal!”

The real question is, were such irregularities, such “fraud” ENOUGH to overturn the election results? I respectfully submit, just as in previous cycles, it’s not enough. More on this (perhaps) coming in a separate post. I’m still composing it, and considering if it’s worth posting on FR in the first place.

But this shouldn’t be shocking, or “news” to anyone following along for the last 50 years. Of course there are “irregularities” and “fraud” in this election. Just like in every election in recent memory. Nothing really new there.

For a foretaste of why, again, I do not believe there is enough evidence to assert that the election was “stolen” see the following Twitter thread I’ve posted before in recent days/weeks. Does it disprove all allegations of fraud? No. But again, for anyone following along the last 40-50 years, not really much surprising, not really much of a “bombshell” to generally claim “election fraud”. Again, that’s already known. And a fact. The only question to really ask is: is such fraud ENOUGH to have overturned 2020?

https://twitter.com/JonathanTCasey/status/1342303141975515136?s=20


44 posted on 01/25/2021 4:03:08 PM PST by FourtySeven (47)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

And speaking of Mr. Navarro specifically, one must note the footnotes 36, 49 and 52 in his first installment “The Immaculate Deception”. Readable here: https://www.thethinkingconservative.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/The-Immaculate-Deception-12.15.20-1.pdf

The careful researcher will note that they point to court cases where, since the publishing of that first installment, such evidence was examined by the courts, “evidence” detailed in those footnotes, and found to be lacking.

Again, I’m still considering detailing this in a separate thread. But if one wishes, for now, it’s relatively easy to see this for oneself with minimal effort I’d say.


45 posted on 01/25/2021 4:10:59 PM PST by FourtySeven (47)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Mathews
You'd think if he could get very detailed numbers like this, there would be names associated with them?>>> For PA, The one category of 202K more mail in votes counted than voters who voted via absentee ballot means that the ballots counted in these cases have no names. They were just printed ballots filled out and counted. (or double counted at the machines that no one could observe.) I have the names of the delaware counter mail in list of both who requested ballots and who returned them. This list has 29,000 more votes than voters who returned the ballots. Only an audit and then a penalty for being out of balance like disallowing all votes in the class that cannot be resolved would prevent this in the future.
46 posted on 01/25/2021 4:27:23 PM PST by kvanbrunt2 (spooks won on day 76)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: dware
There are actual evidence for the numbers in PA of the 202k votes greater than absentee voters. I have the delaware county list and there are 29,000 more votes than mail in voters who voted. That alone should completely disallow all delaware county votes. same holds for Philly, Pittsburg and lackawanna. Plus you have all of the counting being done without watchers. The affidavits of these people not allowed to review counting is embedded in the texas case. In delaware county the lawyer was from Chadds Ford and was given the run around while at the Chester counting center for several days. All in his affidavit.
47 posted on 01/25/2021 4:33:56 PM PST by kvanbrunt2 (spooks won on day 76)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: All

Specifically:

“Even if Plaintiff’s Complaint could be brought under O.C.G.A. § 21-2-521, it also fails
to state a claim upon which relief can be granted because it is based on the premise that the
election is in doubt because the voter rolls were not properly maintained, and because election
officials did not properly verify voter signatures. Even if credited, the Complaint’s factual
allegations do not plausibly support his claims. The allegations in the Complaint rest on
SPECULATION rather than DULY PLED FACTS. They cannot, as a matter of law, sustain this contest.” (emphasis added)

Response to footnote 36 of “The Immaculate Deception”. You can read it here: https://www.democracydocket.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/45/2020/11/2020.12.8-Final-Order-Granting-MTDs-2020CV343018-Boland-v.-Raffensperger-et-al.-KH623927x9D7F4.pdf

(note, the same site, Democracy Docket, is the same one that Mr. Navarro uses in this footnotes 36 and 49, so yes, it’s a leftist website, but Peter Navarro didn’t have any problem citing it in his footnotes. Ask yourself “why” if you now doubt the veracity of Democracy Docket)

It’s a matter of law. The RULE of LAW. Do “we” (those on FR) support the “rule of law” or not?

Just posting this as, again, a foretaste. A sampling of what I’ve personally found. From what I’ve found, there are two categories:

1. That direct evidence (affidavits, statistical analyses etc) was found to be lacking (because the affidafits are “hearsay” or “expert testimony” based on “experts” that lack proper credentials). Or …
2. That a case, or case(s) was/were thrown out because of “lack of standing” or “laches” HOWEVER, one must realize that when that did occur, that is the ORIGINAL reason such a case was brought in the first place, ie, not based on “evidence” but on an argument of the law (so what’s the court supposed to do, consider evidence NOT brought?)

Again, I’m still examining this myself, still considering if it’s worth posting to FR as a separate thread. But from what I continue to find, I’m not finding much to believe the “election was stolen”, at least not enough to reasonably believe the results should have been overturned.


48 posted on 01/25/2021 4:51:47 PM PST by FourtySeven (47)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: FourtySeven

How in the hell can you find fraud WITHOUT audits, of course you don’t know about the fraud NO ONE would let there be an audit!!


49 posted on 01/25/2021 4:55:55 PM PST by Trump Girl Kit Cat (Yosemite Sam raising hell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Trump Girl Kit Cat

I’m sorry I don’t know what you mean by “without audits”. Please elaborate.


50 posted on 01/25/2021 5:00:31 PM PST by FourtySeven (47)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Stayfree

Thanks. Saving to read later.


51 posted on 01/25/2021 5:48:03 PM PST by octex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stayfree

Later


52 posted on 01/25/2021 8:33:08 PM PST by wjcsux (“You can easily judge the character of a man by how he treats those who can do nothing for him.” )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow; null and void; aragorn; EnigmaticAnomaly; kalee; Kale; AZ .44 MAG; Baynative; bgill; ...

p


53 posted on 01/25/2021 9:23:01 PM PST by bitt (Joe Biden has managed to take everything that is wrong with DC bureacracy and fit it into 1 cabinet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: glimmerman70

I agree. Saw counting stop in swing state’s election night with Trump holding the lead. Get up the morning of the 4th to hear about massive vote dumps in the middle of the night for Biden. Ballots and machines should have been seized by federal marshals for immediate audits. Vote fraud, troops occupying DC, Biden ruling by executive decree. Surreal.


54 posted on 01/25/2021 9:54:35 PM PST by Fu-fu2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Mmogamer

Moot and pointless.>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

I would agree with you BUT for the fact this report will function as a foundation of many of the upcoming activities we will see from the “Office of The Former President of the United States.”

President Trump is about to go active once again.

And I and 75 million others support our legitimate President.


55 posted on 01/26/2021 6:25:30 AM PST by Candor7 ((Obama Fascism:http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/05/barack_obama_the_quintessentia_1.html) )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Stayfree

I like the way all the supporting documents are appended but I wish they were clickable and that he had links to Volume 1 & 2.

If the reports with their appended documents were in one pdf somewhere it would be easier to distribute when people started claiming: “No evidence — no evidence”.


56 posted on 01/26/2021 5:33:16 PM PST by KC Burke (If all the world is a stage, I would like to request my lighting be adjusted.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stayfree

Bump


57 posted on 01/28/2021 7:16:14 PM PST by lowbridge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson