Posted on 01/14/2021 5:12:41 PM PST by ebb tide
It takes time for immunity to develop from vaccines - it is not overnight. The testing standard for the Phizer Vaccine was at 28 days after the first shot (7 days after the second). Very elderly, frail patients might be slower to achieve that level of immunity.
It sounds like unfortunate timing, that the outbreak occurred before immunity had developed from the vaccine.
If only they had not delayed approval until after the election...
Do not take the vaccine.
START OF OUTBREAK: DEC 21
START OF VACCINATIONS: DEC 22
What a joke.
Do you deny that there is no proof or evidence that vaccinated persons, like yourself, cannot transmit the virus to others, including patients?
If so, please provide your sources.
“It sounds like unfortunate timing, that the outbreak occurred before immunity had developed from the vaccine.”
The outbreak started one day BEFORE the first vaccination.
100 years of vaccination history speaks contrary
Its axiomatic.
Keep spreading the fear porn. The blood is on your hands.
How many women have you anesthetized undergoing elective abortions?
And zero years of rushed mRNA vaccination is yielding disturbing results.
Who's paying you to pimp this crap?
By the way, you didn't answer my question:
Can vaccinated persons transmit the virus to others?
Yes or No.
“Dec. 22”
So the regulars go on Xmas vacation and the out of work cruise-line chefs are preparing meals.
No they cannot transmit the virus. It would take some critical reading for you instead of just accepting the fear porn talking points.
I am “pimping” well established scientific theory and axiom. You are reading whatever you want from he internet with no back up. It would require an in-depth discussion and sophistication of understanding that you have well demonstrated you lack.
I have never anesthetized for an elective abortion thank you. I also do not have the blood of aborted babies on my hands with the vaccine. It is well documented that there was no aborted tissue used in this exam. There is an 50 year old cell line used in some tangential testing but no aborted tissue was procured for this vaccine from Pfizer nor Moderna.
But dont let the facts get in your way. Various pro-life groups have deemed the vaccine not ethically controversial.
Quit being a putz.
Please provide a qualified medical source.
Thank-you.
What does age (50 years) have to do with it?
Christ wss crucified over 2,000 years ago. Should we dismiss that also?
Probably, possible: a vaccinated person starts slowly develop antibodies to the S-protein, gets infected with substantial viral load next day, meets the non-infected person next day, transmits virus to that person. Not extremely likely, but can’t be excluded. Ideally, it would be nice to know what level of antibodies is protective and when a vaccinated person reaches that level. Probably not practical, because of extensive (and expensive) testing...
Really? Why have you provided no sources for your claims?
Again, it depends on what kind of care facility it is.
We don’t have that info.
Life News is an anti-vaccine website......of course they’re going to seek out the most extreme case they can.
So they found one........I’m not finding reports from other facilities comparing vaccine administering to death rates.
I’ve been to more nursing homes than I would care to think about.
In general, (no stats to back this claim up) 99.9% don’t leave alive.
200-300 bed facility is very large I should add.
There you go again.......as soon as the convo gets tough.....aborted babies comes up.
Try facts without the shock and drama. Perhaps you can’t.
So I guess you’re OK with abortion?
So why make that claim?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.