Posted on 12/13/2020 7:04:44 AM PST by knighthawk
Donald Trump has said he is 'so disappointed' the Supreme Court for refusing to hear the Texas lawsuit to overturn Joe Biden's election victory.
The president told Fox and Friends in an interview aired Sunday his team have 'proven' fraud in the election, adding: 'We've proven it, but no judge has had the courage, including the Supreme Court, I am so disappointed in them.'
His comments came two days after the Supreme Court refused to hear the lawsuit spearheaded by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton that sought to invalidate the election results in four other states.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
Trump never presented his proof in cour...
oh....
The supreme court would’ve maintain credibility if at least held a hearing on the matter, but no they use the bullshit excuse of Standing.
The best course of action is to let them do their election and we do ours. Problem solved.
December 18th approacheth!
Their law doesn’t apply to us and ours to them.
They even stepped in between Gore and Bush back in 2000.
Yep. Hoping to see DNI Ratcliffe with an announcement.
lack of evidence is not an indication that a crime was not committed
Courts don’t like to fix election fraud.
Lower courts are allowed to enable election fraud.
The results can be very bad.
Looks the the takeover is nearly complete. The very next thing on the agenda, first up, will be a MASSIVE unprecedented effort to get the guns to avoid rebellion.
Criminals try to leave no evidence and, when they do, they try to cover it up to the best of their ability. That is why circumstantial evidence must so often be used to convict them.
The Republican legislators of PA, WI, MI, GA and AZ need no courage, just an understanding that Biden’s newly naturalized millions will vote the Republican legislators out of office as soon as possible.
Obama had the good sense not to mess with our guns. He let leftist states do the dirty work.
The only useful tools we have are economic.
Avoid buying new houses or new cars.
A reporter observed ‘the courts were not set up to deal with
the large scale of the election fraud’. They’d better get up
to speed, the evidence is starting to become an overwhelming amount.
And among other mathematicians having observed the fraud is
present by observing patterns in the election data, I just
checked Piton’s comments;
https://twitter.com/BobbyPiton3/status/1338095162426265603
“Updated last night about AZ by Liz Harris MBA
regarding the 95K names I identified and sent her about
Phantom Sleeper Voters. Out of 2,000 knocks and 1,000
responses 539 were found to be ghosts. They didn’t exist”
Courts don’t like to fix election fraud.
+++++
That should have been in all caps. The fact of the matter is that the courts, by their refusal to look at the evidence, have ENDORSED THE FRAUD.
In this election the Dems took advantage of this to “win” the Presidency. Now that fraud has, in effect, been legalized by the courts I fully expect much larger ($billions) efforts to ensure more and more down ballot candidates also “win” in elections going forward.
Why not? It’s apparently legal to do so. To paraphrase Al Gore: There is no controlling legal authority operating in election fraud cases. Legally there is but as a practical matter it is the the Wild, Wild West..
And third party candidates should start filing cases in droves
being it was their election chances that was greatly reduced
by realizing the algorithmic pattern found in the software
always takes votes from the 3rd party candidate.
Forget about proving fraud, it takes too long.
It is sufficient to prove the election was not conducted in the manner properly specified by the state legislature.
Any aggrieved state resident, such a Republican lawyer, would have standing in the Supreme Court.
Bernie Sanders?
Yes, in recognition of the algorithm always taken from the 3rd
party candidate, identifies with this man.
Mr Sanders is one who could be honest and speak out in truth.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.