To: RightGeek
...treated unequally in lockdown orders.
The money quote. If you are going to tell some organizations they can’t meet and others they can, you are violating the constitution. This also applies to “critical” businesses vs non-critical. If my business feeds my family, it’s critical, even if it’s a baseball card shop.
7 posted on
12/03/2020 10:42:09 AM PST by
cuban leaf
(The political war playing out in every country now: Globalists vs Nationalists)
To: cuban leaf
Plus, the free practice of religious freedom is explicitly stated in the first amendment.
8 posted on
12/03/2020 10:45:24 AM PST by
dhs12345
To: cuban leaf
Hmmmm, that “treated unequally” phrase is at the core of the Trump election cases, too.
11 posted on
12/03/2020 11:20:55 AM PST by
alancarp
To: cuban leaf
I’ve seem criticism on other boards (seemingly valid) that this ruling is based on equal protection when, in fact, religion is entitled to UNIQUE and SUPREME PROTECTION under the First Amendment.
Fears were expressed that government could still shut down churches by applying the shutdown equally to all parties (Walmart, Target, etc.)
Fortunately Walmart has tons of lobbyists so as a practical matter it will never happen. But it’s a judicial error that needs fixing.
16 posted on
12/03/2020 12:18:58 PM PST by
Buckeye McFrog
(Patrick Henry would have been an anti-vaxxer.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson