Posted on 11/27/2020 8:38:16 PM PST by rlmorel
Steaming mad.
He has a segment he does where one of his partners (Scott Ott) plays the part of the Liberal in the discussion, and they have a "discussion".
Scott Ott is a pretty sharp guy, and he plays the part of the Leftist antagonist, and he did it so effectively that they ended up naming that session "Epic Rant"
Yes, I was surprised, too...I think even his partners were.
You are most welcome.
Yes...Google is punishing me for each search I do. They force me to do a Captcha session.
YouTube is now forcing me to either open an account and login, or expose my system to their cookies, which I won’t do.
So they punish me for it.
I’ve watched Bill Whittle for a long time and he’s top notch.
Thanks, rlmorel.
I’ve never seen him as fired up as he is now. And rightfully so.
No kidding. Perhaps that is why I connect with him-some conservative intellectuals are on the money, but...they remain dispassionate.
For them, in an academic setting, that makes sense.
I want to see someone who understands it, and see that they are as angry as I am about it.
I understand and agree. Bill Whittle does that and he needs to be heard by as many as possible.
He is the real deal. Met him in 2012. Solid guy. Too good of a man for Fox news.
I used to like Ann Coulter and Glen Beck wasn't bad. People used to say Coulter was in Bed with Romney and Glen Beck took $10K from the Clinton foundation (Beck seemed to stop talking about the Clinton foundation after that.)
After listening to Scott Ott and Stephen Green whom both financed Whittle's shows. They both have been never-Trumpers for a very long time similar to Beck. I'm done with two faced people. You can choose to ignore their alignments as i did by mistake.
For me I chose to ignore them.
I don’t think whittle is a never Trumper.
I personally don't get that indication either. The problem is those that pay his bills. Look at what Laura Ingraham said the other day that Trump should end this basically.
Also we now have Tucker claiming he doesn't see "proof" of voter fraud. Does he really not know we don't need "Proof" of voter fraud. We only need evidence of mass irregularities? "Proof" will be needed in criminal court a couple years from now.
The deep state is showing their true colors if you're willing to pay attention
Carrier Pigeon and a Polaroid
I’m not going to go back and forth with you.
The more who hear Whittle, the better.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.