I’m just tired of the whining from Fox anchors about how they haven’t seen any evidence of election fraud, etc. FFS, have they never heard of twitter or blogs? There’s a ton of evidence and graphs already presented by mathematicians and statistical experts, if they cared to look. Numbers aren’t my thing, but even I understand what a “statistical improbability” means!
Why should they try a case before the news media? They do not determine the President.
The truth is they are news readers and commentary readers not investigative journalists or subject matter experts. The fact is they don’t understand the evidence even when someone lays it on the table in front of them.
A lot of people think this: it easy to learn to code but it is not and people who say it’s easy are usually not adept at bit shifting in the back of their mind while working on ascii character sets as they’re being injected into a database that’s encrypted.
Tucker definitely doesn’t get that kind of stuff
So when anybody hands him an affidavit with what he considers jibberish that explains what’s wrong and why it doesn’t work right or Why it does things the wrong way script readers see nothing but gibberish.
A waste of her time.