Posted on 11/16/2020 4:50:26 PM PST by AndyJackson
Here are some pictures of the draft pleadings regarding Fraud wrt/ Smartmatic
Hee hee :-)
It undermines any case that the software is inherently secure and prevents fraud. It was designed to further fraud.
Those are two different things. No software is inherently secure and no software will prevent fraud. No SW will prevent fake ballots, harvesting real ballots, etc. The claim here is that the SW has bias. But marking 10,000 ballots and running them through the machine will reveal bias if it exists.
If this is the SW that is in the ballot marking devices, then the will need to create 10,000 ballots using the touch screen, then inspect those 10,000 created ballots to make sure they are accurate including the QR codes
The pregame has gone on too long, the season still needs to be played, and finals are less than a month away. The last resort is state legislatures who need to know why they are intervening, if it comes to that.
I was feeling so down today, after reading some of the comments on this thread.
Then this afternoon I overheard a bit of a broadcast by Larry Elder (why have I never listened to this man) covering this same topic, and my gray day immediately brightened.
GEORGIA: Ex-Kemp Staffer Lobbies For DOMINION, Voting Madness Leads To Lame ‘Recount’
Most of the downer posters, of late, as it relates to POTUS, are merely trolls.
Don’t buy what they’re selling.
Very astute. I live in the swamp and unfortunately know a lot of ‘swampy’ people. The higher up ones in the IC are particularly swampy and express the most irrational things about Trump. The subtext I’ve always gathered from their inane cocktail banter about Trump being “a dangerous man” is that he’s really only a danger to the game they’ve all been playing and profiting from for generations. The SK/NK stuff was the absolute worst to listen to.
No software is inherently secure and no software will prevent fraud.
First, that is not true. Second it sits in a larger system that was also supposed to be robust against substantial fraud. My friends and I could design a system that would provide an honest and reliable count and would provide clear evidence if it had been tampered with. Such a system was not wanted.
i am not watching this video but
“Dominion’s vice president warned in 2016 that vote-counting systems are manipulable
Dr. Eric Coomer, vice president of Dominion Voting Systems that allegedly fraudulently passed votes from President Trump to Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden, warned in 2016 that vendors and election officials could manipulate the results.
The systems must be recertified each time they make changes to the hardware or software, which is a very costly process, in which Dominion does not recertify itself.
It seems that none of the systems used throughout the United States comply with the recertifications, which, in any case, does not prevent them from being manipulated from the software.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BbCmq0jPUxY
I want Powell et al, to ultimately be successful. The excerpt seems geared to going after large blocks of votes, to have then thrown out as tainted and the vote count manipulated via Smartmatic Software. That involves a complex conspiracy to rig the election. Thinking this through, mostly for myself, but I invite critique/improvements/stronger facts.
MOTIVE: No brainer. Democrats wanted to win.
MEANS: Powell’s material in her post sets the foundation for showing that the “means” to change votes via software existed, and was integrated into it as a “feature” not a “bug”.
OPPORTUNITY: Elsewhere, we hear that there are affidavits galore proving that Republican monitors were excluded from observing the counting of vast numbers of ballots; kept 20 feet away, sent home due to fake waterline breaks; sent home when election officials declared fake halts at 3-4am, then continued counting once they got the Republican observers out. There is evidence that voting machines were connected to the internet, in violation of requirements. All the above shows “opportunity”, and deliberate creation of opportunity.
PROPENSITY: Numerous affidavits establish that election laws in key areas were broadly violated regarding deadlines for receiving lawful ballots; backdating; improper chain of custody; mass-produced fake ballots with only Biden marked; no proper ID on ballots; and no verification of those identities as a lawfully registered voters. Since the Dems were violating the law in numerous conventional ways, there is no basis to exclude that they would cheat using any other means available, including software manipulation.
EVIDENCE THAT MATERIAL SOFTWARE-DRIVEN VOTE-COUNT RIGGING SOMETHING OCCURRED ON NOV 3, 2020: Strangely, it’s not enough to prove the Dems had the motive, means, opportunity, and propensity. The mountain to climb here is proving that software was actually used to alter votes and change the outcome of the election. What individuals are accused of doing exactly what, when, and how?
There are statistical analyses showing: odd jumps in ballot counting; how certain algorithms could produce the same tainted results; and how the outcome patterns violate statistics “laws”. Is that sufficient evidence for a judge to throw out mass numbers of “votes”, knowing it will likely change the result of a national election and bring all hell down upon their heads? Or will they demand hard evidence that software was actually USED to change votes in THIS election? Without forensic analysis of the computer systems, how can you prove that occurred, absent someone willing to testify (at the price of death/family’s death)? If the plaintiff gets court orders to allow their experts to examine the computers, how long will that take? Has the computer evidence already been spoiled? Is it possible to track communications to particular computers by IP address, to show interference at set times? Or was the software rigged to do this on autopilot via the last-moment “update”, or by local thumb-drives or operatives at the scene coordinated by phone?.
Go Sydney!!!
Bird dogging. Chase the birds out of the foliage. Pick them off one by one as they expose themselves.
Biden hasn’t been a Senator since 2008.
p
The media and DNC are attempting to “try” this case in the “court of public opinion”, but 2 can play at that game...
Ignorable ... if it were genuine ‘hammer’ would have carried the actual CIA designation of HAMR (for the four words it shorthands).
Perhaps its a way to get people scared enough to turn.
I think that is a part of the strategy--always worth a try.
There are probably several hundred (or more) individuals involved in this massive fraud scheme--if you can pick up a couple of folks with a conscience and/or trying to save their skin that is a good thing.
This is an interesting response:
Anonymous Mon 16 Nov 2020 13:26:37 No.286902302,71 ReportDelete
Quoted By: >>286902302,72
>>286897767
I think this was Dr Eric Coomer.
He is a climber and the keys are on a carabiner.
Most of the downer posters, of late, as it relates to POTUS, are merely trolls.
I hope so, because otherwise some of them really need to be on suicide watch. ;-)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
