[SeekAndFind]

Trump’s Pennsylvania case does not have the complication of the state versus federal law interaction because it jumps over the state law and, as noted, relies on a host of U.S. SCOTUS cases about the importance of voting.

The complaint has much more, designed to bolster its central point. Many other instances of fraudulent activity are cited, which lends credibility to the main accusation. They are also indispensable to establish a factual case — that the exclusion not only occurred, but mattered, because thousands of ballots were counted in secret.

Reading the news reports, it appears likely that similar complaints are going to be filed in other swing states and that perhaps we are seeing the exposure of a broad-based effort to corrupt the election. Joe Biden claimed that the Democrats were mounting the biggest voter fraud effort in history, and a good rule for living is that when someone tells you he is about to screw you over, believe him.

It is possible, then, that a number of cases will hit the Supreme Court in about three weeks.

[Blood of Tyrants]

“Joe Biden claimed that the Democrats were mounting the biggest voter fraud effort in history, and a good rule for living is that when someone tells you he is about to screw you over, believe him.”

A Freudian slip where Biden accidentally told the truth. Deblablas daughter accidentally said it, too.

[Mariner]

This article explains the only viable path for Trump.

They’ll never be able to prove enough fraud.

But they stand a darn good chance of proving there was not the transparency guaranteed by law, invaliding the electoral processes and methods...and results.

[GOPJ]

...it's brilliant all the same. It shifts the focus from state law, where a politicized Pennsylvania court has the last word, to federal law, where the U.S. Supreme Court rules.

Similar tactic was used against the thugs and looters... protecting the Federal Court House exposed liberal mayors who were in on the violence.

[lightman]

Pennsylvania Ping!

Please ping me with articles of interest.

FReepmail me to be added to the list.

[rightwingcrazy]

A similar argument could be made in Michigan. Several other states, for that matter.

[Dr. Pritchett]

It was Pennsylvania’s fraud that disenfranchised PA voters who’s votes will be discarded. It was Pennsylvania’s fraud that disenfranchised all other US voters who’s votes will supposedly be counted alongside their fraudulent mess. This is all on Pennsylvania’s officials and their fraud.

[Political Junkie Too]

The gist is that some of the state's actions, and particularly the exclusion of Republican poll-watchers during the counting of hundreds of thousands of mail-in ballots, violated federal constitutional requirements.

I thought the gist was that Pennsylvania Democrats created a two-tiered system of voting, where the "in-person" voter was subjected to rigorous identification checks while the "by mail" voter was not, essentially violating equal protection.

The "in-person" voters' rights were violated by the loose accountability afforded to the "by mail" voter.

-PJ

[nd76]

What I can’t understand is the result in Nebraska CD-2.

In the House race, incumbent GOPer Don Bacon defeated his ‘Rat opponent Kara Eastman by over 16,000 votes, 168k to 152k.

However, in the presidential race Trump only got 149,880 votes, losing by over 21.6k to Biden, who got 171,517. This is a 37k vote swing.

Why wouldn’t a Biden voter vote for the ‘Rat House candidate?

This is so strange.

[Sergio]

bkmk

[TianaHighrider]

Prayers continually!!!