From a legal point of view, it's not clear from the interview alone what crimes are implicated. Unfortunately there was no follow-through on the money, that is, the $5 million+ the $5 million. From other sources, primarily Giuliani's interviews, we are told the tens of millions rolled into the Biden family from China but that does not appear to be the case from this interview. That is unfortunate.
It makes it infinitely more difficult for the mainstream media to claim Russia hoax or to smother the scandal.
The Daily Caller article has links to some of the documents and business proposals.
https://dailycaller.com/2020/10/27/hunter-biden-joe-biden-china-colombia/
But when you only have about 47 minutes... they really needed to linger more on the fact that Bobulinski mentioned complying with certain regulations, and "the Chairman gave an emphatic NO," followed by that moment that Bobulinski learned that the money was going straight into Hunter's personal account, not Oneida's corporate account.
Kennedy interview with Guiliani was a pure deflection away from connecting 2 data treasures he has. 1 the laptop , 2 the trail he says shows money laundering , and a backup the state department allegedly blocks to have Ukrainian witnesses come under oath to corraborate.
More troubling to me as it relates to justice is a Jonathan Turkey quick comment to the effect that their is some Congress approved backing of nothing wrong with relatives engaging in the hunter type of scheme.
Thats how they retire rich as multimillionaires because as hunter states 50% to Dad and 10% for the big guy