The Ministry of Propaganda has to keep up the narrative lest people catch on that they have been lying to them daily for decades.
Stahl is just another democrat surrogate pretending to be a journalist. They will take any gossip printed in the NYT as gospel but verifiable facts are instantly debunked.
The MSM would never report on anything they can’t verify. Meanwhile, Trump doesn’t pay taxes, cavorts with prostitutes in Moscow, and colludes with Putin to steal US elections.
Stahl torpedoed John Tower’s Defense Department nomination by reporting that he danced naked on a piano with a Russian ballerina. This was told by a lunatic that nobody believed. Woodward did the same with a story from a discharged Air Force lunatic.
What is it with PBS and the alphabet news shows that they must bury us with these femtards?
Oh and Leslie, get a new dress, you aint a 18 year old honey pot, but thanks for not Beavesplainin.
Just more ‘gas lighting’ by the old media.
If only we knew who controlled the ‘old media’...?
What does Barbara Wa Wa and Christiane Amanpour think?
What’s with the goofy Covid mask on the table? Cooties?
Lesley Stahl is ugly and stupid.
Trump is handsome and brilliant.
Lesley Stahl is wretched and ignorant.
Trump is joyful and wise.
Lesley Stahl is a withered Communist liar.
Trump is a robust Patriot speaking Truth to Power.
These old lying journalists think they deserve respect, they deserve contempt.
The pathetic thing is is that she knows that what she is saying is wrong ... and that she knows it’s incorrect yet she says it anyway makes her a damn liar ... for all to see.
Rush is right when he says Trump needs to explain things better because he thinks everyone knows as much about spygate as we do.
To many people “spying on a campaign” is so what? Sounds like what happens when the rats volunteer one of their people into GOP HQ to report back and vice versa.
What Trump should say is that they used the FISA court to spy on his campaign. That is far more significant.
What is the point of an interview if one side will not acknowledge facts? Something must be done concerning the corporate media in the US.
Stahl will pay no price whatever for denying there was no verified evidence when there certainly was. She is a guttersnipe in a guttersnipe’s business.
I hope once Trump is re-elected, he’ll be able to look around and say, “Now I have a better idea of whom to trust.” And then do a round of firing that will look like a Top Ten Apprentice Moments compilation.
So if I were to go back over the past 4 years, I would not be able to find any examples of a 60 Minutes story on the Trump-Russia collusion hoax then, right? Please.
bump
If you haven’t seen the full unedited interview released by Trump I highly recommend you do. A lot of fun watching Stahl getting discombobulated.
It is a first class example on how to treat the enemedia. Trump went sfter Stahl and her ilk with a vengeance exposing their incredible bias.
IOW - he treated them like the enemies they are and not some unbiased, fair minded reporter doing her job.
Other Republicans and conservatives could use that as a lesson on how to deal with the media.
Hit them again, harder, harder!